Our Ongoing Slide into a Police State

I am convinced that our whole Government has been captured a long time ago. The agenda continues to advance. One whould think you put a good guy in and he shall clean it up but nope. Good guy gets either threaten or bribed to overlook things. We see small wins here and there and I think they allow that to give us an illusion that things are turning around. Massive Perp walks should be happening now with the stolen Election, Lawfare, Covid and many other obvious things. Everyone needs to realize....You are on your own. Live accordingly!

To those freaking out that President Trump is selling Federal Land to build houses, just know…. this is a DIRECT REVERSAL to the 2030 Agenda, to SEIZE more Land.

Less Federal Land is GOOD!

There is Literally a Globalist Plan to SEIZE 30% of ALL Land and Water on Planet Earth, by 2030, known as the 30x30 UN Agenda

• The United Nations has Proposed something called the 30x30 Agenda and is spreading everywhere, fast…
—— the European Union is implementing it as we speak.
—— California is using the exact same language.
—— Joe Biden’s own EO mentions “conserving 30% of our lands and water” by the year 2030.

HOW DO YOU DO THAT IN THE UNITED STATES?

• Maybe through “natural disasters”?

• Through the ‘Sustains Act’…
—— this was signed into law in that huge Omnibus that was rushed through last year.
—— This allows the US government to receive private funds to advance conservation programs.
—— This became one of the biggest private/public partnerships in human history.

• The ‘Sustains Act’ looks to assign “environmental services” that are provided on Privately Owned land.

• What are “Environmental Services”?
—— whatever they want… from your land.
—— perhaps your property contributes to pollination, photosynthesis, air quality..

• “It’s all being monetized through a relationship between private investors, like Bill Gates and the Government.
—— And it all occurs WITHOUT the land owners… this is ALREADY US Law..”

Did you vote for this?
Was this ever explained to you?
Did anyone ask for your approval?

President Trump is literally reversing it.

Defilade said:

There is a Plan to Seize 30% of ALL Land a Water on Planet Earth, by 2030, the 30x30 UN Agenda

rumble.com

To those freaking out that President Trump is selling Federal Land to build houses, just know…. this is a DIRECT REVERSAL to the 2030 Agenda, to SEIZE more Land.

Less Federal Land is GOOD!

There is Literally a Globalist Plan to SEIZE 30% of ALL Land and Water on Planet Earth, by 2030, known as the 30x30 UN Agenda

• The United Nations has Proposed something called the 30x30 Agenda and is spreading everywhere, fast…
—— the European Union is implementing it as we speak.
—— California is using the exact same language.
—— Joe Biden’s own EO mentions “conserving 30% of our lands and water” by the year 2030.

HOW DO YOU DO THAT IN THE UNITED STATES?

• Maybe through “natural disasters”?

• Through the ‘Sustains Act’…
—— this was signed into law in that huge Omnibus that was rushed through last year.
—— This allows the US government to receive private funds to advance conservation programs.
—— This became one of the biggest private/public partnerships in human history.

• The ‘Sustains Act’ looks to assign “environmental services” that are provided on Privately Owned land.

• What are “Environmental Services”?
—— whatever they want… from your land.
—— perhaps your property contributes to pollination, photosynthesis, air quality..

• “It’s all being monetized through a relationship between private investors, like Bill Gates and the Government.
—— And it all occurs WITHOUT the land owners… this is ALREADY US Law..”

Did you vote for this?
Was this ever explained to you?
Did anyone ask for your approval?

President Trump is literally reversing it.

Click to expand...

30% on its face doesn't sound like much, so take out a Map of the United states, fold it into three lengths like you're going to stuff it into an envelope, then open it back up to see how much of the Country that really is....there is WAYYY more to the Democrats going to extremes to take and retain Power than simply hating Trump.

tirwin1 said:

Not good. Trump is fine but I fear what comes after him, whether it's JD Vance or (even worse) a Democrat. The surveillance state that currently exists will only get stronger and it will definitely be abused.

"Pray For a Good Winter, but Plant Lots of Cabbages" - The Last Refuge

Abandoned by his father to a troubled single mother; eventually raised by grandparents. He is then recruited from an Ivy league law school by shadow figures, a specific billionaire and a network of interests. He changes his name, writes a book about his life story, and with the support of the...

theconservativetreehouse.com

Click to expand...

Worked out for Barry Soetoro aka Barrack Obama didn't it?

Defilade said:

There is a Plan to Seize 30% of ALL Land a Water on Planet Earth, by 2030, the 30x30 UN Agenda

rumble.com

To those freaking out that President Trump is selling Federal Land to build houses, just know…. this is a DIRECT REVERSAL to the 2030 Agenda, to SEIZE more Land.

Less Federal Land is GOOD!

There is Literally a Globalist Plan to SEIZE 30% of ALL Land and Water on Planet Earth, by 2030, known as the 30x30 UN Agenda

• The United Nations has Proposed something called the 30x30 Agenda and is spreading everywhere, fast…
—— the European Union is implementing it as we speak.
—— California is using the exact same language.
—— Joe Biden’s own EO mentions “conserving 30% of our lands and water” by the year 2030.

HOW DO YOU DO THAT IN THE UNITED STATES?

• Maybe through “natural disasters”?

• Through the ‘Sustains Act’…
—— this was signed into law in that huge Omnibus that was rushed through last year.
—— This allows the US government to receive private funds to advance conservation programs.
—— This became one of the biggest private/public partnerships in human history.

• The ‘Sustains Act’ looks to assign “environmental services” that are provided on Privately Owned land.

• What are “Environmental Services”?
—— whatever they want… from your land.
—— perhaps your property contributes to pollination, photosynthesis, air quality..

• “It’s all being monetized through a relationship between private investors, like Bill Gates and the Government.
—— And it all occurs WITHOUT the land owners… this is ALREADY US Law..”

Did you vote for this?
Was this ever explained to you?
Did anyone ask for your approval?

President Trump is literally reversing it.

Click to expand...

About 28% of US land is currently federally owned. Right now. Today. Maybe we should get rid of it and let China buy it, right?

Willyone said:

This is the kind of 3rd world shit that makes preppers, preppers. The worst part, well one of the worst, is that only a small percentage of the USA citizenry realize what's going on, or gives a shit.

Click to expand...

Two year old post is even more accurate today.

Making a Stand in America - Full $225,000 Breakdown

When Rights Meet Authority:
In this detailed examination of a Vermont property rights case, we've witnessed a powerful educational example of what happens when government authority collides with constitutional rights. This incident represents far more than a simple disagreement about a fire pit—it reveals fundamental principles about jurisdiction, consent, and the proper limits of government power. As we've explored throughout this analysis, the Constitution serves not as a grant of rights to people, but as a strict limitation on government power. This case perfectly illustrates how officials often misconceive their role, assuming authority as their default position rather than recognizing it as the limited exception that must be justified when challenged. The property owner's repeated withdrawal of consent and challenge to jurisdiction triggered clear legal requirements under Vermont law. Once consent was withdrawn, officials had a duty to either establish proper jurisdiction through warrant or genuine emergency, or to depart the property. Their failure to do so transformed their presence from lawful to unlawful—from official acts to ultra vires acts beyond their authority.

Our analysis has identified numerous specific violations that occurred: criminal trespass after explicit notice to leave, unlawful detention without proper authority, privacy violations through unwarranted searches and photography, due process violations through enforcement without investigation, emotional distress through exacerbation of PTSD, public humiliation through false emergency display, defamation through creating false impression of wrongdoing, misuse of public resources through inappropriate emergency response, and ultra vires acts by exceeding lawful authority. These violations created significant liability exposure not just for the departments involved, but for the individual officials who continued their actions after being explicitly informed they were violating the owner's rights. The Shield of Souls Assembly connection adds a crucial jurisdictional layer that strengthens the property owner's position. When operating under assembly jurisdiction through freedom of association, the owner established an additional barrier to government intrusion—one that officials failed to properly address. This assembly status provides additional standing and creates further jurisdictional challenges for any enforcement action.

The potential remedies in this case are substantial, with damages potentially ranging from $131,000 to $225,000 based on Vermont precedent for similar violations. The most effective approach combines administrative remedies through properly structured notices, tort claims under Vermont law, constitutional claims in federal court, and bond claims against individual officials. This multi-pronged strategy addresses both the individual misconduct and the systemic failures that enabled it. This case serves as a powerful educational example of how constitutional rights function in practice: rights pre-exist government and are not granted by it; government authority requires consent or specific emergency exceptions; once jurisdiction is challenged, officials bear the burden of proving their authority; officials acting beyond their authority lose immunity protections; and proper documentation and assertion of rights creates accountability.