Nadler (D) Suggests a Dem President Can Seize Guns After Trump’s National Emergency Precedent

Hear this FUDDS?

Its not nonsense, the President, any President has the constitutional right to secure our borders. Our border crisis is critical, it threatens our prosperity, our way of life! The democrats are encouraging a massive influx of illegal immigration to gain and maintain political power. The democrats have advanced destructive identitarian politics and set Americans against each other, for political power. The democrats have embraced and encouraged crony capitalism and globalism to siphon all the wealth away from the middle class to fill there own coffers. The democrats are attacking and destroying the entire Constitution, most prominently the 1st and 2nd amendments.
The democrat party is a belligerent invading force that seeks the destruction of everything this Nation once stood for. And all for money, power.

We must rebel, if we do not we die.
We must kill democrats, for if we do not they will certainly kill us.
The democrats are the enemy. We must destroy them or they will destroy us, the liberty loving peoples of the United States of America.
The Red Coats have come they are here, now!

TAKE UP ARMS! FIGHT THE DEMOCRATS!!

Pod...sober up and re-think your post. I'll back the Courts.

Good luck with that one moron. A state of emergency still can’t take away your constitutional rights.
They are just trying to scare us into not supporting Trump. They might try, but how can guns be a national emergency if the homicide rate is down 40% from 25 years ago. How come that cock sucker Clinton didn’t do it.

Constitution Trumps democrats wet dream.

I do find it hard to believe the POTUS would go around seizing guns! And in his absence I wonder who they propose would accomplish such a task?

If all the military, LE and First Responders in this country participated, they'd have to seize an estimated 68,000+ guns per day (based upon100,000,000) over the next presidential term, that includes Sunday's and Holiday's!

I'm sure after they hit 100,000 the resistance would begin, then what?

These fucking pot smoking criminal migrant coddling tree hugging snowflake politicians really are lost in fantasy land...

The country could not legally process the seizure and subsequent arrests of resistors who object non-violently even... What do these idiots propose, internment camps for violators?

When will the understand that this Gov't gets to do what it does by public voluntary compliance! They couldn't handle a mass non-compliance effort... Yeah, you'll get your 20% who are scared and would buckle at first notice.

So maybe when pigs fly, an idiot would propose using Emergency Presidential Powers to suspend the constitution as most despots have done. This isn't Venezuela! But if they did (try), they'd learn the reason why the 2nd exists...

Anyways...

You know darn well, if the Democrats thought that they could have suspended the 2nd Amendment with a "National Emergency," they would have done it already.

seize all the guns in America... Let him volunteer to take the first 1000

hey shit for brains Nadler if that So .. then .. Come on Prez Trump .. drop the 4 ace's on the table ..

Trump declares national emergency on Democratic voters .. no more Democrat votes .. there a high risk to are nation and way of life .. ..

dubleuhb said:

Hear this FUDDS?

Click to expand...

They ain't coming after my deer gun, bird gun, and revolver. Don't be ridiculous. They ain't even black. Chrome and wood is safe.

Yeah, I'm sure it's their wet dream to be able to do something like that, but it's not legal nor is it consistant with their boiled frog policy. It would ignite a huge backlash. Now, declaring *cough* "gun violence" a national emergency not to confiscate but to further more restrictions might be in realm of possibility, but I don't see that going well either. Assuming the libs haven't expanded the supreme court in their favor by then, any declaration would likely be ruled unconstitutional. There are other public health/safety issues with higher death rates.
I too believe at this point it's a hollow threat to scare Trump's base.

ArmedCorgi said:

Yeah, I'm sure it's their wet dream to be able to do something like that, but it's not legal nor is it consistant with their boiled frog policy. It would ignite a huge backlash. Now, declaring *cough* "gun violence" a national emergency not to confiscate but to further more restrictions might be in realm of possibility, but I don't see that going well either. Assuming the libs haven't expanded the supreme court in their favor by then, any declaration would likely be ruled unconstitutional. There are other public health/safety issues with higher death rates.
I too believe at this point it's a hollow threat to scare Trump's base.

Click to expand...

The base will become a bit more angry.... More inclined to get to the voting booth

I hope they ban hollow points. You don't need all that.

Willjr75 said:

I hope they ban hollow points. You don't need all that.

Click to expand...

Call your representatives...You may be the call they need

Willjr75 said:

I hope they ban hollow points. You don't need all that.

Click to expand...

Next thing you know they'll be banning frying pans.

dummy, is trying the Old tried and True Scare tactics...

"...and we will confiscate your little dogs too!"

The Dems are just bitter..... Because of a thing called "The Nuclear option".

Well he just echoed Pelosi from all the way across the country. They are telling us what they are going to do, and still there are those that hear but do not listen.
Robin

National Emergency, there is no faster way to create a National Emergency than trying to take guns from Law abiding citizens.

Do the DemocRATS not remember the Bundy Stand off. well if they try to declare a National Emergency on guns, that will turn into the Bundy Fire fight is short order.

Let's just get this show on the road already. Tired of waiting

Just so sad how little these people understand our rules, laws and regulations.

Comparing the security of our borders with a Constitutional Right.

Sad and funny at the same time.

GOPerfect said:

Just so sad how little these people understand our rules, laws and regulations.

Comparing the security of our borders with a Constitutional Right.

Sad and funny at the same time.

Click to expand...

They don't give a shit about the rules. The operate above the law.

Funny there has been 58 “national emergencies” declared since the law was put on the books in 1976 and a shit load of them don’t have anything to do with our national security or our nation for that matter with many from Carter, Clinton and Obummer.
Now Trump uses it for national security and we’re to believe all of a sudden the Dems will get the idea to use it to ban guns? That shows you they believe gun owners to be ignorant, foolish and reactionary.