I know that exception exists in theory; the Court of Appeals has even mentioned it recently. But I am not aware of any case where the withdrawal and communication defense to being the initial aggressor was successful in a deadly force situation. Do you know of any?
Full vid here:
https://x.com/Osint613/status/1999919443091070982
Story here:
https://abc7ny.com/post/off-duty-kingston-officer-shoots-driver-during-road-rage-confrontation-wawayanda-orange-county-police-say/18280369/
Good shoot or bad shoot?
It's not even worth a response to scammers - criminals - undercovers - whoevers like this. Ignore.
And to beat the others to the punch . . .
What you selling?
Well it’s over. No charges for her.
https://nypost.com/2025/12/04/us-news/federal-grand-jury-declines-to-indict-ny-ag-letitia-james-after-doj-refiled-mortgage-fraud-charges/
I have acknowledged I was wrong and RFK Jr. was stupid enough to say that.
But as I posted above the BlackRock stakes in all 3 of those packers amount to (1) insignificant percentages in Marfrig and JBS and (2) although a larger stake in Tyson, that is a non-influential stake as control of...
Well I guess I shouldn't be shocked he actually said that, but it's crazy because it's just not true.
For example, Tyson is controlled by a family partnership. BlackRock's acutal ownership:
The reason it is an 8.78% fund shareholder is because Tyson is in a bunch of indexes like the S&P...
That's just patently not true. RFK Jr. never said that. As an aside, the actual numbers are BlackRock owns 9% of IBP Tyson, 2% of JBS, and 0% of Cargill, and 0% of National Beef (Marfrig).