Search results

Here is the chatgpt summary: Core Conclusions § 1715 is unconstitutional as applied to constitutionally protected firearms — specifically handguns and similar arms — because it conflicts with the Second Amendment. The Department of Justice may no longer enforce § 1715 against protected...

DOJ has issued a binding legal opinion that the 1927 ban on mailing handguns was unconstitutional. https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1423701/dl

The song writes itself. 1-877-KASH4ARMS, ARMS cash for arms . . . .

A house in a free state far away from this craphole?

The answer to that is scary: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/second-front-how-socialist-cell-us-mobilized-pro-maduro-foot-soldiers-within-12-hours

The Chief’s revolted against the last unqualified commissioner, so maybe they will again.

Mensa member

You are a wise gentleman. @Celt's advice should be everyone that CCW's christmas gift for this year.

I know that exception exists in theory; the Court of Appeals has even mentioned it recently. But I am not aware of any case where the withdrawal and communication defense to being the initial aggressor was successful in a deadly force situation. Do you know of any?

Very good observation, you could even say this: . . . if you are an initial aggressor then you may not have the same NO protections under article 35.

Still think the English are a bunch of softies? Well then watch this brave and dramatic rescue of a woman from raging floodwaters near Birmingham:

https://x.com/GlobalUpdates24/status/2000143836916658366

Full vid here: https://x.com/Osint613/status/1999919443091070982 Story here: https://abc7ny.com/post/off-duty-kingston-officer-shoots-driver-during-road-rage-confrontation-wawayanda-orange-county-police-say/18280369/ Good shoot or bad shoot?

It's not even worth a response to scammers - criminals - undercovers - whoevers like this. Ignore. And to beat the others to the punch . . . What you selling?