Search results

Thats good to know, I dont mean that in any sort of bad way, but reality is those bullets had to land in the crowd behind him . thats a lot of bullets fired into the crowd

I was going to post the same exact thing, the first 2 shots are to close together it had to have come from the same gun. the other shots may have come from the secret service, but there would be bodies on the ground for sure. where did those 2 shots go?

A lot of tactical similarities to the German invasion .

Polish Ukraine security agreement Intriguingly, the agreement refers to “cooperation in shooting down and countering air attacks” from Russia heading towards Poland. Will this help protect the skies over western Ukraine? (All air attacks from Russia to Ukraine are headed toward Poland on an...

He was correct about Quaddfy . He wanted to be paid in gold . He was going to a gold back dinar system . 6 months later he was dead.

He nailed it! Although we've all been saying it since the get go. He was against the covid sham too. and so were we .

The plant produces and tests what General Dynamics calls “energetic products” – the explosive components of missiles, rockets, and other projectiles. According to the company’s website, the 880,000 square foot (81,750 square meter) facility produces Hydra rockets, Hellfire and Javelin warheads...

Why would they care if Russia lost the black sea fleet? why would they care that Russia lost control of her shipping Lanes? Why would they care that they could crush a huge part of the Russian economy ? Why would they care that Russia would be mostly eliminated from the entire Mediterranean...

Well , there is some merit in what your saying there.

Yes there's a lot of little details Like haveing your airfields fuel facility's hit with Iskander missiles

Maybe so, But losing Ukraine doesn't seem to be a good plan. No doubt NATO wanted the Crimea , that was the jewel of the whole war. That could have crippled Russia .

So you think its our fault because we are intentionally withholding arms ? And the Russians are winning. What would the point of that be ? besides making a dollar ? Because in the end. the Ukraine falls. I suppose then they can arm up the Baltics and Poland

We dont have that.

We cant. We dont have enough airpower everytime somebody body runs into the enemy. The assets are prioritized . say you have a 12 man recon team with attached assets of 2 Apache and 1 one gunship for a mission . Now there is a company size element cut off and under attack , taking...

Oh my God your ridiculous. Even in Afghanistan our air power couldn't reach everywhere at once No concept of how things work . Its not like it is on TV . If your so sure that the weapons we supply to Ukraine are so advanced how come they are losing?

No. your talking apples and oranges again . 1st I said a division. second one side had total air dominance , the had no air assets at all. the outcome was predictable According to the U.S. military, the presence of U.S. special operations personnel in the targeted base elicited a response by...

Is the US weak because we run NATO? the agreement was a military pact between Russia, China, NK, And Iran. stating if one is attacked the others are obligated to fight with them. If Russia is attacked by NATO it would mean NK will attack US bases in SK and japan as will China , Iran can...

Your still looking at the problem wrong. Say you have a a team of 50 of the best well trained marksmen delta force veterans . And the Russians attack their position from three sides with a division . You know what happens to those those troops? they all die . The russians take that Position...

ANd the other targets you couldnt hit destroys your position and I move forward again. . What is happening is that trained people . weapons and ammo are being destroyed at a faster pace then can be than can replaced. The russian weapons themselves ane'nt bad . the Russian doctrine and...

The Pajamas really gave it away. :p

This is exactly what is happening in Ukraine

Why would you call me an apologist? Makes no sense. Oh I noticed, but there are people on here who cant see that.The ones who think they are clowns

Napoleon once said, ""lost Territory I can regain, lost Time ,I cannot"" If the enemy can destroy your weapon systems faster than you can replace them , somewhere down the road your going to have a a major problem . A problem even money can't solve.

Seriously? That statement qualify s you to work on the Whitehouse staff. NK is just a small part of a bigger picture that some cant seem to notice.

Somehow that doesn't surprise me . We've depleted our own stock piles and still cant supply Ukraine with enough arms W'eve spent hundred of billions of dollars with no end in sight . How deep do you think this well goes? We cant produce enough arms for Ukraine now, We just dont have the...

US is denying the incident

Invading NK isnt the problem. fighting them is the problem. Say things get hot in Ukraine , or Israel invades Lebanon and Iran jumps in on thier side.Maybe the chineese see an opprotuinty in Taiwan, then NK gets froggy because US assets are spread thin and decides its the right time to unify...

Russia shoots down US reaper drone over the Black sea (Unconfirmed. )

They want Russia to bite. Anything to bring NATO into the fight. Ukraine is lost . The only thing that can save her now is NATO . Putin isnt going to take the bait . plus the west is hemorrhaging cash at a ridiculous pace .

I guess NK, Iran and China can now send ""mercenaries"" to Ukraine . Things are just getting better and better. Hopefully it wont go South before elections and we get someone in there that would like to cool things down

CNN-Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned Western countries they’re taking a “very serious and dangerous step” by supplying weapons to Ukraine, which could result in Moscow arming their enemies...

So you think Russia should just stay the fuck home, but the US should have desert shielded Russia. ?

Submission is not realistic by any stretch of the imagination.

I would still like to hear how you think Putin should have played out the situation . What should Russia HAVE done in the face of the situation? What would have been the logical move for Russia?

Dude, thats the way it was set up. I didnt make the rules. by invitation or no invitation they had entered a neutral country and posed a threat . It is what it is . They are a sovereign nation that broke its neutrality and are paying the price for it .Of course they are a sovereign nation...

Ill explain it like this, Ukraine was a neutral state. It worked out well for both sides , neither side were supposed to use Ukraine for military purposes . Ukraine was buffer state for Europe and for the Russians it worked out well for both sides . the Ukrainians agreed to this neutrality and...

Your right, but thats not what they said. Putin or anybody else never said anything like that. Your whole Premise is wrong, and therefore your arguments are wrong . Russia had total control of Ukraine , and had allowed them thier own sovereignty under the agreement they would never join NATO ...

Dam right it would have. Putin even admitted that Russia cant beat NATO. NATO is a national security threat to Russia, just because you dont think so doesnt mean anything. The Russians see it that way and rightfully so. LOL that and a huge list of other things you cant typically see Dam...

Well your correct there In theory, but in reality, thats what NATO was intended to stop . ANY attack against NATO could result in a nuclear war. the nuclear deterrence Ukraine was not a part of NATO , there was no nuclear trip wire where we were committed to go. but that was all going to...

Hitting him first with nuclear weapons , not Hitting him with conventional weapons , thats a provocation which is designed to place blame on Russia. Russia isnt going to nuke anyone if they are not attacked

I think he would have no choice but to release nuclear weapons on NATO targets If they attacked Russia .Thats their stated policy. the decision has already been made , theres no ""if's"" about it . Nothing left for him to do there. A cruise missile attack only ,would only escalate further ...

ORRRRR, we can avoid a nuclear Apocalypse and not attack him . We dont have to . We can just say no to nuclear war.

You keep saying NATO is'nt a threat to Russia Beate Landefeld @BeateLandefeld The President of Colombia left the Zelensky summit “I decided to suspend my visit to the “Peace Conference” in Switzerland: what we found at the conference is essentially an alliance on the side of war and we do...

Its not apologist at all. Nothing was wrong with the arrangement the way it was. Ukraine agreed to be neutral, Ukraine agreed to the Minsk accords , NATO agreed not one inch Eastward "You promised us in the 1990s that [NATO] would not move an inch to the East. You cheated us shamelessly,"...

Putin just said "Any airfields hosting Ukraine's F-16 fighter jets, whether they are in or outside the country, will be legitimate targets for the Russian military if they participate in combat missions against Moscow’s forces." So being attacked by NATO planes is an escalation on Russias...

Good point.

LOL! buffer? yes! They had a fucking buffer for the last thirty 30 years! what the west wanted was /is an expansion into the buffer zone when they wanted Ukraine to join NATO. ie: NATO bases on Russias border , Loss of the black sea fleet . The target had always been the break up of russia into...

Bullys? lol. Does the word hypocrisy mean anything to you? You do know that if the war starts you and your family are going to die right?

He was promoting it.

You sound like Adolph Hitler