Search results

Here is the chatgpt summary: Core Conclusions § 1715 is unconstitutional as applied to constitutionally protected firearms — specifically handguns and similar arms — because it conflicts with the Second Amendment. The Department of Justice may no longer enforce § 1715 against protected...

DOJ has issued a binding legal opinion that the 1927 ban on mailing handguns was unconstitutional. https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1423701/dl

The song writes itself. 1-877-KASH4ARMS, ARMS cash for arms . . . .

A house in a free state far away from this craphole?

The answer to that is scary: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/second-front-how-socialist-cell-us-mobilized-pro-maduro-foot-soldiers-within-12-hours

The Chief’s revolted against the last unqualified commissioner, so maybe they will again.

Mensa member

You are a wise gentleman. @Celt's advice should be everyone that CCW's christmas gift for this year.

I know that exception exists in theory; the Court of Appeals has even mentioned it recently. But I am not aware of any case where the withdrawal and communication defense to being the initial aggressor was successful in a deadly force situation. Do you know of any?

Very good observation, you could even say this: . . . if you are an initial aggressor then you may not have the same NO protections under article 35.

Still think the English are a bunch of softies? Well then watch this brave and dramatic rescue of a woman from raging floodwaters near Birmingham:

https://x.com/GlobalUpdates24/status/2000143836916658366

Full vid here: https://x.com/Osint613/status/1999919443091070982 Story here: https://abc7ny.com/post/off-duty-kingston-officer-shoots-driver-during-road-rage-confrontation-wawayanda-orange-county-police-say/18280369/ Good shoot or bad shoot?

It's not even worth a response to scammers - criminals - undercovers - whoevers like this. Ignore. And to beat the others to the punch . . . What you selling?

Jerome Powell and the rest of the Fed, your days are numbered

https://x.com/GoldenAgeTimes2/status/1997147379443671538

It's obvious Biden and the Wray FBI buried this investigation to preserve the J6 hoax.

Heh just posted this other version

Well it’s over. No charges for her. https://nypost.com/2025/12/04/us-news/federal-grand-jury-declines-to-indict-ny-ag-letitia-james-after-doj-refiled-mortgage-fraud-charges/

Don't worry the Supreme Court will save us from this nonsense. (That line is getting old)

I have acknowledged I was wrong and RFK Jr. was stupid enough to say that. But as I posted above the BlackRock stakes in all 3 of those packers amount to (1) insignificant percentages in Marfrig and JBS and (2) although a larger stake in Tyson, that is a non-influential stake as control of...

Well I guess I shouldn't be shocked he actually said that, but it's crazy because it's just not true. For example, Tyson is controlled by a family partnership. BlackRock's acutal ownership: The reason it is an 8.78% fund shareholder is because Tyson is in a bunch of indexes like the S&P...

That's just patently not true. RFK Jr. never said that. As an aside, the actual numbers are BlackRock owns 9% of IBP Tyson, 2% of JBS, and 0% of Cargill, and 0% of National Beef (Marfrig).

Is it a patsy, or the real perp? https://www.foxnews.com/politics/police-arrest-suspect-dc-pipe-bomb-case-after-5-year-investigation

https://x.com/langmanvince/status/1996277179395821700?s=61

Yonkers, Mt Vernon - it all blends Although FWIW Coyne Park does not have any charm in my opinion. Very expensive for a municipal range stuck in a time machine from 1963.

The lesson from this election is that Democrats can run the worst possible candidates and still have a shot at winning. That's how deep TDS runs.

There's always Pioneer in Yonkers. That place has its charm.

Don't worry, the Supreme Court will save us . . .

Also half off on all uncommanded P320 discharges ;)

It's about 35 bucks to shoot there but it seems to be a decent range. Who cares about the attitude on the RO and staff, if they leave me alone I leave them alone.

https://x.com/mrddmia/status/1991906042200944756?s=61

If you want to talk economics, is spare change and encrusted cat shit worth $50,000? Because that will be the least possible amount you will need to pay in legal fees even if you are not criminally charged. Investigation, grand jury, and civil suit by the perp's family.

The key definition for "dwelling" in the context of Article 35 comes from the Court of Appeals in People v. Hernandez, 98 N.Y.2d 175 (2002). Basically comes down to "a person's residence" and "the determination of whether a particular location is part of a defendant's dwelling depends on the...

That is not correct. The meaning of the words "castle doctrine" are to establish that you have no duty to retreat within your dwelling. This is enshrined in the New York Penal Code Section 35.15 2.(a)(2), which reads in relevant part (emphasis added): A person may not use deadly physical...

Yes of course, I only wanted to point out the law in New York on these points, since I assume most visitors here are NYers. But I don't think you were saying there is a duty to retreat inside the "castle" portions of your home? That's not the case. Of course the justification requirements...

Just FYI, in New York State the castle doctrine extends to your garage but only if it is part of the main house. A separate structure is not part of your castle. A garage attached to the main house that does not have a passage door into the house does in fact count as part of the castle. Also...