4th Circuit Sets Stage for a New National Gun Ban.

[livingston]

In case someone looked at the 4th Circuit Court ruling in Kolbe and thought that it only applies to the 4th Circuit, Jonathon Keiler writes a piece in the American Thinker today to disabuse that person entitled 4th Circuit Sets Stage for a New National Gun Ban. Keller argues that the 4th Circuit was anticipating a Clinton win, in which case she would already have her nominee sitting on the Supreme Court, and would have by now rammed a gun ban through at least the House. Keiler:

Standing By: More on the 4th Circuit Ruling in Kolbe

Articles: Fourth Circuit Sets the Stage for a New National Gun Ban

 

[Podmonkey]

I've already made a personal commitment that I will not tolerate any further federal gun bans. I will regard any additional federal anti gun legislation as a Paul Revere warning and act accordingly.

 

[stuck in ny]

I've already made a personal commitment that I will not tolerate any further federal gun bans. I will regard any additional federal anti gun legislation as a Paul Revere warning and act accordingly.

The courts may have set a stage for their plans, but Mr. Kalashnikov and Mr. Stoner set a stage for the opposite!

 

[Criticalt]

If a national ban doesnt get the Deplorables riled up, we might as well hand in our guns and grab a pussy hat to wear at the next womans march.

 

[Podmonkey]

The courts may have set a stage for their plans, but Mr. Kalashnikov and Mr. Stoner set a stage for the opposite!

That's Goddamn right!

 

[prambo]

 

[capitalcrew]

If a national ban doesnt get the Deplorables riled up, we might as well hand in our guns and grab a pussy hat to wear at the next womans march.

I'll be there for the pussy. I'll wave.

 

[freddy]

,,, act accordingly.

So... you're going to enjoy even more 4tube.com than you already do?
There's only 24 hours in a day, man!

 

[Drinkthekoolaid]

Gun owning Citizens haven't just been buying up all the ammo they can just because they have extra money laying around that needs spending.

 

[Celt]

Had to like all the posts in this thread. More gun control in the liberal states will get ZERO reaction from the majority of gun owners (there are too few of us that are as staunch as most of us on here).

But..... a ban in the free states would create quite a stir.. however, thats not happening under trump, not a chance. What NEEDS to happen, is relentless challenges against standing laws once we have a solid scotus.

 

[FrankenCub]

Gun owning Citizens haven't just been buying up all the ammo they can just because they have extra money laying around that needs spending.

Wish I had some of this money! To hell with food, will work for ammo

 

[pjzwtl]

If there was ever a time for the ole hag Ginsberg to buy the farm it is now.....

 

[Cooolone]

Yawn...

I get a kick out of all the worrying... Not going to make half a billion guns disappear no matter what they ban, and it'll just push manufacturing into the basements...

Not a give-a-shit in my eye!

 

[JosERW]

It looks like a national gun ban is the only way we're going to get SCOTUS to defend the Second Amendment.

 

[JosERW]

Had to like all the posts in this thread. More gun control in the liberal states will get ZERO reaction from the majority of gun owners (there are too few of us that are as staunch as most of us on here).

But..... a ban in the free states would create quite a stir.. however, thats not happening under trump, not a chance. What NEEDS to happen, is relentless challenges against standing laws once we have a solid scotus.

The only way we're getting a circuit split is if a free state bans guns.

 

[Acer-m14]

didnt hawaii just do that .. ban all permits ...

 

[JosERW]

Does the fact the 4CA ruled that "aw" are not even in common use create a split with other courts that did?

 

[spat]

It looks like a national gun ban is the only way we're going to get SCOTUS to defend the Second Amendment.

Unless trump gets to appoint some mord justices.

Sullivan has been on the books for a century, but if Trump gets 3 justices, we could still appeal it all the way up and theoretically get it overturned.

 

[ProgSpear]

The last paragraph from the second article:

"The case will be appealed, and Justice Gorsuch should be on the bench by the time the decision for review is ripe. It's incumbent on the Roberts Court to act appropriately, make the justices of the 4th Circuit pay for their gamble, and put some meat on Heller. A failure to do so would set the stage for a quick national ban in the event that Trump does not win re-election in 2020."

Hmm. Soap Box, Ballot Box, Jury Box and ... Oh, wait. That one got banned.

 

[Vinson57]

2nd amendment not standing as is, means an end to SCOTUS and to rule of law for that matter. Its the cement and when outlawed, kiss it all good by. Some of the members of SCOTUS fail to realize why they are there.

 

[JosERW]

The last paragraph from the second article:

"The case will be appealed, and Justice Gorsuch should be on the bench by the time the decision for review is ripe. It's incumbent on the Roberts Court to act appropriately, make the justices of the 4th Circuit pay for their gamble, and put some meat on Heller. A failure to do so would set the stage for a quick national ban in the event that Trump does not win re-election in 2020."

Hmm. Soap Box, Ballot Box, Jury Box and ... Oh, wait. That one got banned.

Honestly the 4th really went full crazy in their decision and if Roberts/Kennedy have a single shred of honor left they will finally vote for cert otherwise every circuit court should take this as an invitation to ignore SCOTUS rulings.

 

[ProgSpear]

Honestly the 4th really went full crazy in their decision and if Roberts/Kennedy have a single shred of honor left they will finally vote for cert otherwise every circuit court should take this as an invitation to ignore SCOTUS rulings.

And if they fall that far from originalist intent, we should take it as an invitation to ignore any court ruling we see fit. 9th amendment, folks.

 

[JosERW]

And if they fall that far from originalist intent, we should take it as an invitation to ignore any court ruling we see fit. 9th amendment, folks.

That's what I said. If SCOTUS refuses then every conservative judge should just make up their own judicial tests to ignore Supreme Court precedent. However leftists get treated more fairly than gun owners in the court system.