Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
What red highlight part?
What red highlight part?
Read the next decision.My signature that you point too!
Read the next decision.
It's irrelevant for the reasons I told you about earlier.You didn't read the link I posted in #26 did you?
It's irrelevant for the reasons I told you about earlier.
The McDonald decision cleared up the uncertainty left in the wake of District of Columbia v. Heller as to the scope of gun rights in regard to the states.
Damn. It's amazing at what lengths you go to defend gun control.
Damn. It's amazing at what lengths you go to defend gun control.
Weren't we talking about states ignoring the Constitution? I mean you posted a link containing the Constitution of multiple states.
It's been proven to you that people concealed carried, had machine guns, had cannons, ect when the 2A was written. It was also proved to you that other Amendments in the BILL of Rights have clear, written restrictions on their amendments unlike the 2nd.Sorry Will it is you who don't get it! Prove what I posted is wrong!
I did. Means nothing. You didn't think that GW wanted the citizenry to have arms but wanted the State to take them away now do you? It's a clear case of infringements until a court said that they couldn't do it anymore and to this day is still ignored.You didn't read about incorporation did you?
I did. Means nothing. You didn't think that GW wanted the citizenry to have arms but wanted the State to take them away now do you? It's a clear case of infringements until a court said that they couldn't do it anymore and to this day is still ignored.
Once you realize that the system is broken and corrupt, you'll see what I'm saying. Until then, keep defending the government and their infringements. Keep quoting decisions that clearly go against the 2A.They love people like you.
30 years from now if SCOTUS makes another corrupt decision, there will be another person like you quoting that decision as gospel and defending future infringements.
Yes. Apparently you didn't since you can't read and understand the other amendments that have clear restrictions unlike the 2nd that says, "Shall not be infringed."Did you even finish High School?
They always did. They were illegally not paying attention to it until a court said that they had to. Jeez man. What is wrong with you?
It's not an opinion. If something is declared unconstitutional, it always was unconstitutional. It's just that a court finally got it.Just your opinion, that's not proof!
Boy. You really have a comprehension problem. When something is in violation, it always was in violation. You don't need proof for that. I can't believe I'm even wasting my time on this with you.Again you give no proof just opinion!
There is plenty of information online that proves you wrong, post something tat proves you right!
Boy. You really have a comprehension problem. When something is in violation, it always was in violation. You don't need proof for that. I can't believe I'm even wasting my time on this with you.
I guess when you did something wrong as a kid, it was always right and good until your parents said that it wasn't right?
Jesus. You really are a simpleton.
Your research shows when something was ruled unconstitutional. That doesn't mean that it was constitutional before that. If it was, it wouldn't have been ruled unconstitutional.Really and I'm the one who is doing the research and posting facts! I was waiting for you to start the name calling and insults!