Actors at Casting Call Are Surprised by Real Gun Facts They're Asked to Read

Mk44

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
1,552
Reaction score
1,716
Location
NY

Saltwater60

.950 JDJ
Messages
33,401
Reaction score
37,655
Location
Western NY

Celt

.338 Win Mag
Messages
9,479
Reaction score
19,371
Location
Westchester

libertysnake

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,572
Reaction score
15,943
Location
New York
Last edited:
S

stuck in ny

Guest
One thing I didn’t like is that the tone of the argument is very defensive. “Handguns account for 80% of mass shootings.”

So do we really want them to restrict handguns more? We shouldn’t be holding off the tide of gun grabbers, we should be arguing for why they’re dangerous in how far they’ve come already and why we should be putting the law back to levels the founding fathers intended.

The argument I’d to see is “Why have an estimated six times AS many people been killed by their own government than in battle?” Democide - Wikipedia

Then I’d like to see them try to make an argument why people should not be allowed to arm up to the level of the average G.I.
Seig Heil! The Grammar Nazi strikes!
 

S&W Fan

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
13,985
Reaction score
20,843
Location
Syracuse, NY

Celt

.338 Win Mag
Messages
9,479
Reaction score
19,371
Location
Westchester

Criticalt

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,358
Reaction score
15,607
Location
WNY
Top