ATF Director to Testify on Pistol Brace Rule, Zero Tolerance for FFLs, & Frame or Receiver Rule! live 10:50 4/26

L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
43,483
Reaction score
119,376
Location
livingston county

ATF Director Steven Dettelbach has been ordered to appear before the House Judiciary Committee in an Oversight Hearing on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. He will be answering for their stance and efforts on the pistol brace rule, the zero tolerance rule for FFLs, and the frame or receiver rule. Should be FUN!!
 
Jmac00

Jmac00

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
17,802
Reaction score
48,418
Location
somewhere in America
I can't watch anymore, the left is doing nothing but pontificating with bullshit diatribes that mean nothing but to denigrate Law Abiding Gun owners and the GOP. The GOP wants to end the ATF, defund our cops and strengthen our borders. But the fucking idiots on the left are saying THEY are the ones that supporting the cops, THEY want a stronger border, THEY want to strengthen the ATF.

And the director dipplebutt, has no clue what hes doing. Jordan asked him flat out "Would the new brace rule turn millions of American citizens into felon's" simple question. The fucking piece of shit danced all around the answer, and never came close to giving a yes or no answer

Adam schitt was the WORSE. His entire diatribe was complete lie. He should have no standing in the Congress, along with that shitweasel swollowwell, I DISPISE both of them assholes.

And Johnson, the moron that thought Guam was going to tip over with to many Marines on it? How is he even allowed to question anything.

the STUPID IS STRONG WITH THESE MORONS
 
SomeSoldier

SomeSoldier

.450/400 Nitro Ex
U.S. Military
Messages
9,608
Reaction score
18,478
Location
Florida
Jmac00 said:
I can't watch anymore, the left is doing nothing but pontificating with bullshit diatribes that mean nothing but to denigrate Law Abiding Gun owners and the GOP. The GOP wants to end the ATF, defund our cops and strengthen our borders. But the fucking idiots on the left are saying THEY are the ones that supporting the cops, THEY want a stronger border, THEY want to strengthen the ATF.

And the director dipplebutt, has no clue what hes doing. Jordan asked him flat out "Would the new brace rule turn millions of American citizens into felon's" simple question. The fucking piece of shit danced all around the answer, and never came close to giving a yes or no answer

Adam schitt was the WORSE. His entire diatribe was complete lie. He should have no standing in the Congress, along with that shitweasel swollowwell, I DISPISE both of them assholes.

And Johnson, the moron that thought Guam was going to tip over with to many Marines on it? How is he even allowed to question anything.

the STUPID IS STRONG WITH THESE MORONS
Click to expand...

Don't forget we shell out 40% of our hard earned pay for this performance.
 
Phazer

Phazer

.338 Win Mag
Messages
9,206
Reaction score
18,893
Location
Province of Westchester
GunOwnershipVCrimeRate.jpg

Sure, it would be academically dishonest to claim that more guns mean less crime. BUT, raw data certainly shows that more guns DOES NOT lead to more crime.
 
Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
6,778
Reaction score
12,889
Location
Rochester
Jmac00 said:
Jordan asked him flat out "Would the new brace rule turn millions of American citizens into felon's" simple question. The fucking piece of shit danced all around the answer, and never came close to giving a yes or no answer
Click to expand...
He wouldn't even answer when Massie asked if the original brace, that was used to get ATF permission, would pass today's rules.
He comes up with some BS answer of "if it was designed to be fired from the shoulder".
As far as I know none of the braces were designed to be fired from the shoulder. At least not per the manufacturer. some may have been ABLE to...but not designed to.
So who makes that determination? who gets to say what the design intent was on an item? The people who are making it or some unelected and highly politicized bureaucrat with an agenda?
 
Beerman

Beerman

.223 Rem
Messages
1,465
Reaction score
2,355
Location
North Creek
Grimscale said:
He wouldn't even answer when Massie asked if the original brace, that was used to get ATF permission, would pass today's rules.
He comes up with some BS answer of "if it was designed to be fired from the shoulder".
As far as I know none of the braces were designed to be fired from the shoulder. At least not per the manufacturer. some may have been ABLE to...but not designed to.
So who makes that determination? who gets to say what the design intent was on an item? The people who are making it or some unelected and highly politicized bureaucrat with an agenda?
Click to expand...

Good point. An anus is designed and intended to be used for solid waste elimination, but the fed gov figured out how to abuse that particular orifice of the American population almost immediately.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top