Biden Asks Social Media Companies to Crack Down on Any Vaccine Discussion That Does Not Comply with Official Government Narrative

[Defilade]

So it seems the problem would be the government then.

No Doubt.

 

[SonOfSun]

FUCK JOE BIDEN

Fuck joe biden
Fuck Donald trump
Fuck Nancy Pelosi
Fuck Mitch McConnell
Fuck Hillary Clinton
Fuck Kevin Mccarthy

In short, fuck them all.

 

[libertysnake]

Fuck joe biden
Fuck Donald trump
Fuck Nancy Pelosi
Fuck Mitch McConnell
Fuck Hillary Clinton
Fuck Kevin Mccarthy

In short, fuck them all.

The problem is massive egos like this are always the ones attracted to power, and we've come to value massive egos as a society.

 

[livingston]

Big Tech Responds to Joe Biden Request​

There are no coincidences in politics; there are only people who recognize them, and people who do not.

Big Tech Responds to Joe Biden Request - The Last Refuge

There are no coincidences in politics; there are only people who recognize them, and people who do not. Yesterday, the biggest fraudulent and heavily managed autocrat in modern American political history gave instructions to his fellow travelers in Big Tech, and I quote: “I make a special appeal...

theconservativetreehouse.com

 

[livingston]

 

[Acer-m14]

Big Tech Responds to Joe Biden Request​

There are no coincidences in politics; there are only people who recognize them, and people who do not.
View attachment 142730

Big Tech Responds to Joe Biden Request - The Last Refuge

There are no coincidences in politics; there are only people who recognize them, and people who do not. Yesterday, the biggest fraudulent and heavily managed autocrat in modern American political history gave instructions to his fellow travelers in Big Tech, and I quote: “I make a special appeal...

theconservativetreehouse.com

love it ..

 

[spat]

Ok, and why did you say no?

Where exactly did the government hire Facebook?

You don't think they're doing that at government request ?

Sometimes these things don't come with invoices and receipts.

Sometimes it's a "if you do/don't want this legislation, you do this".

There have been many many calls from government for Facebook, et al to more aggressively censor conservatives.

The implied threats are unmistakable.

 

[spat]

So it seems the problem would be the government then.

That is the way of Facism. Government directs, private industry implements.

In a system like ours, how do you even draw the line between government and private industry ?

If your "private company" is funded 80% by government contracts, and it's operation is entirely directed by government, isn't it government ?

 

[Darth]

You don't think they're doing that at government request ?

Sometimes these things don't come with invoices and receipts.

Sometimes it's a "if you do/don't want this legislation, you do this".

There have been many many calls from government for Facebook, et al to more aggressively censor conservatives.

The implied threats are unmistakable.

And we all know that no big tech or Hollywood group would be leftist (as they have every right to be) and anti-free speech on their own accord.

It's downright unheard of.

 

[Darth]

That is the way of Facism. Government directs, private industry implements.

In a system like ours, how do you even draw the line between government and private industry ?

If your "private company" is funded 80% by government contracts, and it's operation is entirely directed by government, isn't it government ?

One thing we'd need is a bit more proof than "Oh come on, you know they are doing it..."

 

[spat]

And we all know that no big tech or Hollywood group would be leftist (as they have every right to be) and anti-free speech on their own accord.

It's downright unheard of.

They have every right to do that on their own.

They have no right to do it in exchange for government favors. People should be prosecuted for offering and for accepting such.

 

[spat]

One thing we'd need is a bit more proof than "Oh come on, you know they are doing it..."

I agree. That's why there should be a comprehensive investigation to uncover it.

Or is this going to be like election fraud, where we eliminate all the safeguards to detect fraud, then claim the fact we can't see the fraud means it doesn't exist.

 

[Darth]

I agree. That's why there should be a comprehensive investigation to uncover it.

Or is this going to be like election fraud, where we eliminate all the safeguards to detect fraud, then claim the fact we can't see the fraud means it doesn't exist.

Well, no, that's not how it works.

One doesn't just get to claim something is going on and get to use the coffers of the government to harass private citizens or entities.

See: Obama and the IRS.

 

[spat]

Well, no, that's not how it works.

One doesn't just get to claim something is going on and get to use the coffers of the government to harass private citizens or entities.

See: Obama and the IRS.

So, we don't investigate without evidence, and we don't have evidence without investigation.

You get that off the Clinton's website ?

 

[Darth]

So, we don't investigate without evidence, and we don't have evidence without investigation.

You get that off the Clinton's website ?

I think you are killed Kennedy.

At this point should I be able to dictate government resources to you in order to determine if I am correct?

 

[spat]

I think you are killed Kennedy.

At this point should I be able to dictate government resources to you in order to determine if I am correct?

Well, if it's a credible accusation, then yes, they should investigate.

You don't *start* with iron clad evidence and then conduct an investigation. What would be the point ?

You start with a reasonable suspicion, then gather evidence to support it.

You start with what amounts to a hunch, and as you can gather more supporting evidence you increase the intensity of the effort.

 

[Darth]

Well, if it's a credible accusation, then yes, they should investigate.

You don't *start* with iron clad evidence and then conduct an investigation. What would be the point ?

You start with a reasonable suspicion, then gather evidence to support it.

You start with what amounts to a hunch, and as you can gather more supporting evidence you increase the intensity of the effort.

Agreed.

So now that we've conflated 2 separate issues, let's focus on one.

Should private entities be allowed to control what is and is not shown on their property?

OR

You have evidence that the government is paying Facebook to promote propaganda?

 

[spat]

Agreed.

So now that we've conflated 2 separate issues, let's focus on one.

Should private entities be allowed to control what is and is not shown on their property?

OR

You have evidence that the government is paying Facebook to promote propaganda?

Both.

Private businesses absolutely have the right to say whatever they want short of calls for violence.

Facebook isn't an entirely private business though, there are well documented ties to government that are undoubtedly only the tip of that iceberg.

Government has publicly called for Facebook to abuse that power.

 

[Darth]

Both.

Private businesses absolutely have the right to say whatever they want short of calls for violence.

Facebook isn't an entirely private business though, there are well documented ties to government that are undoubtedly only the tip of that iceberg.

Government has publicly called for Facebook to abuse that power.

If the government has been funding them, I'm 100% with you.

But that's not the argument I ever see being made. I always see "well, publisher...editor...town square..." and that is a baseless load of crap that will backfire on those arguing for it.

 

[spat]

If the government has been funding them, I'm 100% with you.

But that's not the argument I ever see being made. I always see "well, publisher...editor...town square..." and that is a baseless load of crap that will backfire on those arguing for it.

Google, Tesla, Apple, Facebook rake in massive subsidies: report

Tesla’s subsidies from Nevada cost a Reno-area school district tens of millions of dollars in revenue, report says.

www.mercurynews.com

But that pales in comparison to the straight up extortion.

"That's a nice platform immunity you've got there, be a shame if something happened to it".

 

[GOYABEAN]

The führer has spoken

 

[96coal449]

We have to stop trusting these companies, and live our lives offline more where we are free. We should be viewing the digital age as one of entrapment as much as it is convenience. It's not all bad, but it's high time people started realizing it isn't all good either

I couldn't agree with you more. We could also weaponize social media against them. It can be used to grow unity amongst patriots and like minded. Let them pinco commie cock suckers see how many are ready to stuff their pitch forks down the throats of tyrants.