Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
I don’t know.wasn't there a vid clip of a point bank shot on a ladys head too ..
all they do is lie lie lie ..
I don’t know.wasn't there a vid clip of a point bank shot on a ladys head too ..
all they do is lie lie lie ..
This is the nonsense we’re up against I was just asked “why do you need something that’s designed to blow targets apart?” View attachment 161101
You can't explain anything to these idiots. They have drunk the koolaid so long they have diabeetus from it.Just return the question to the asker. Find out if they'd rather get shot with a .45, or a .357, or a .380? Or any other round they believe will be less lethal than a .223/.556 or 9mm.
Explain if they're getting hit center mass with any round they're going to have a very bad day. So the type of round is not gonna matter a whole bunch.
Hell, the idiot sponsor of the NY rifle permit bill admitted that he didn't know what a ".22" was.You can't explain anything to these idiots. They have drunk the koolaid so long they have diabeetus from it.
That’s nearly exactly what I said. They seem to thin the AR and .223 are some super special combination that makes them capable of defying physics. It’s mind boggling.Just return the question to the asker. Find out if they'd rather get shot with a .45, or a .357, or a .380? Or any other round they believe will be less lethal than a .223/.556 or 9mm.
Explain if they're getting hit center mass with any round they're going to have a very bad day. So the type of round is not gonna matter a whole bunch.
It’s that shoulder thing that goes up.Hell, the idiot sponsor of the NY rifle permit bill admitted that he didn't know what a ".22" was.
I start by telling the ignorant "ban assault weapon" people that an ar15 is one of the weakest rifles sold. They just don't fucking get it. After explaining that most other rifles, and shotguns are far more powerful, they continue with the nobody needs an assault rifle bs. I'm convinced you can't knock any sense into them without using a 2x4.That’s nearly exactly what I said. They seem to thin the AR and .223 are some super special combination that makes them capable of defying physics. It’s mind boggling.
The whole conversation started because she’s a dog person talking about changing dog behavior by removing the problems, and saying people are the same way. I turned the conversation around by saying that all pit bulls should be banned because all they are are killers.
Drunk on power . Total disarmament is the goal . Canada bans all handguns they hope and on the same week biden has a discussion on gun control with this woman from New Zealand ....You can't explain anything to these idiots. They have drunk the koolaid so long they have diabeetus from it.
.223 is too powerful a round to own ... Then everything larger will also be to dangerous to own. ... All laid out there... Plain and simple. Ban them all ...I start by telling the ignorant "ban assault weapon" people that an ar15 is one of the weakest rifles sold. They just don't fucking get it. After explaining that most other rifles, and shotguns are far more powerful, they continue with the nobody needs an assault rifle bs. I'm convinced you can't knock any sense into them without using a 2x4.
If a 5.56 AR is so deadly and destructive, how come most states won’t let me hunt deer or large game with an AR in that caliber?This is the nonsense we’re up against I was just asked “why do you need something that’s designed to blow targets apart?” View attachment 161101
I was going to make that argument but I didn’t want to bring hunting into it, or killing for that matter.If a 5.56 AR is so deadly and destructive, how come most states won’t let me hunt deer or large game with an AR in that caliber?
Yup. Diesel tech , is that you ?They want to associate gun ownership to hunting.
They want to be able to tell people "we're not taking away your guns, you can still hunt, we respect your traditions"
And without fail they will roll some fudds out in front of the cameras saying how it's common sense and they agree.
And that’s where I will call for any caliber bigger than 5.56 to be banned, because if an AR15 in 5.56 is too dangerous, than surely any caliber bigger and more powerful than that can’t be allowed to be in civilian hands like 20 gauge, 12 gauge, 243, 270, 308 or 300 win mag. Then watch all the FUDDs squirm.Yup. Diesel tech , is that you ? View attachment 161173
Pretty much everything above 22LR since 5.56 mm is .223 cal.And that’s where I will call for any caliber bigger than 5.56 to be banned, because if an AR15 in 5.56 is too dangerous, than surely any caliber bigger and more powerful than that can’t be allowed to be in civilian hands like 20 gauge, 12 gauge, 243, 270, 308 or 300 win mag. Then watch all the FUDDs squirm.
Aren't .22LR (or R or shorts for that matter) actually .224?Pretty much everything above 22LR since 5.56 mm is .223 cal.
Oops.Aren't .22LR (or R or shorts for that matter) actually .224?
Higher caliber! BAN EM!
Lexington and Concord was a direct response to an attempt to enforce new gun control laws.My biggest problem with all this left-wing dribble is the idea that the second amendment is about hunting and target shooting. That's a lie that keeps getting peddled. The AR-15 and semi-autos ARE deadly. They ARE weapons of war. And that's is exactly WHY Americans have the right to bear them. The founders believed that an armed populace is what keeps tyranny in check. Hell, we should be allowed to carry fully automatic weapons. Whatever the military carries. That's the whole fucking point. An armed populace to resist a tyrannical government. Then they start with the musket shit. Muskets were the standard military rifle in 1776. The colonists were carrying exactly what the redcoats were using. Hell the Revolution started when the redcoats tried to seize the muskets and ammo in Concord and Lexington. ITS CALLED THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD! These gun control progressives either don't understand the constitution or hate it.
My biggest problem with all this left-wing dribble is the idea that the second amendment is about hunting and target shooting. That's a lie that keeps getting peddled. The AR-15 and semi-autos ARE deadly. They ARE weapons of war. And that's is exactly WHY Americans have the right to bear them. The founders believed that an armed populace is what keeps tyranny in check. Hell, we should be allowed to carry fully automatic weapons. Whatever the military carries. That's the whole fucking point. An armed populace to resist a tyrannical government. Then they start with the musket shit. Muskets were the standard military rifle in 1776. The colonists were carrying exactly what the redcoats were using. Hell the Revolution started when the redcoats tried to seize the muskets and ammo in Concord and Lexington. ITS CALLED THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD! These gun control progressives either don't understand the constitution or hate it.
Warships.shields and bows and spears and catapults and how many other weapons can we add that were weapons of war ? before the 2a
Thank you for the correction. Now that it’s clarified it makes even more sense…to make my pointLexington and Concord was a direct response to an attempt to enforce new gun control laws.
The king sent his law enforcers to confiscate newly outlawed *cannons*. Not muskets, cannons.
The people who fought and won that war wrote the second ammendment. Pretty sure they meant it to apply to "military style" weapons.
These gun control progressives either don't understand the constitution or hate it. It's both!Lexington and Concord was a direct response to an attempt to enforce new gun control laws.
The king sent his law enforcers to confiscate newly outlawed *cannons*. Not muskets, cannons.
The people who fought and won that war wrote the second ammendment. Pretty sure they meant it to apply to "military style" weapons.
I think the 2A should be interpreted to grant all US flagged vessels the equivalent of a letter of Marque in times of war.Warships.
I want to win the lottery so I can commission an WARSHIP.
Anyone wanna sign on for a chance to play with a 16" Mark 7 rifle?