BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
Testifying under oath once again proves much more intimidating than testifying on MSNBC. Go figure.
Yup. Cause her hubby might finally learn the truth.Testifying under oath once again proves much more intimidating than testifying on MSNBC. Go figure.
Answering under oath = TestimonyTestifying under oath once again proves much more intimidating than testifying on MSNBC. Go figure.
Watch the first 10 minutes .... Knocks it out of the park...
Answering under oath = Testimony
Answering interview questions on MSNBC = slander.
FIFY
Now BK needs to follow thru and sue her for defamation of character.
Some of these so called experts say she will never be sued . Better to let it fade away ... He would be viewed as the aggressor ...FIFY
Now BK needs to follow thru and sue her for defamation of character.
In countries where women act like ladies, when a man makes inappropriate contact or makes unwelcome advances verbal or physical he gets a slap across his face.
Can you run for office please? I don't really care where I'll move to vote.
He needs to be confirmed this Friday, no more bullshit. Time is very important we all know the reaper has his eye on RBG and there's lots of vetting to do.
You KNOW they accept that challenge.What's to vet?
I triple dog dare the Democrats to smear Amy Coney Barrett
You KNOW they accept that challenge.