BREAKING: Police shoot, kill man in DC - Protests begin

carpediem

carpediem

.338 Win Mag
Messages
5,977
Reaction score
4,229
Location
Peoples' Republic of New York
Maybe a day could go by without somebody feeling the need to fight with/run from/harass the police. Hey, here's a stunning idea, don't want the cops to shoot you? Try not being a frickin career criminal! Amazing! Millions who aren't criminals have never been shot by the cops. Silly me, it's their right to be criminals, but we just need to get woke enough to stop interfering with that right.....
Why is this country heading down this retarded path? Lack of accountability and education. Free and easy welfare.
Disgusting......
 
Shadow2

Shadow2

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,391
Reaction score
2,066
Location
Westchester
CaseHardened said:
Shoot a HUNDRED.

The RIOTS will stop.

If they do not, shoot TWO HUNDRED.

RIOTERS ARE VERMIN.
Click to expand...

I don't think Police or Military should be shooting civilians. Not good. What should be happening is the locals should be the ones to use deadly force to protect their lives and property. That way it cant be used against the police or government.
 
CaseHardened

CaseHardened

.450/400 Nitro Ex
U.S. Military
Messages
11,468
Reaction score
11,714
Location
Danvers, MA
Shadow2 said:
No i don't get it. Simply deeming assholes terrorists is a bad precedent to set. You could easily loose your rights and be deemed a terrorist tomorrow.
Click to expand...

I'm a terrorist ?

I will not:

Block Traffic

Burn Buildings

Assault anyone based on their Race or Politics

Loot Stores

Intimidate Diners

Disrupt peaceful neighborhoods

If I do any of these things, I deserve serious justice.
 
spat

spat

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
29,805
Reaction score
62,786
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
Shadow2 said:
No i don't get it. Simply deeming assholes terrorists is a bad precedent to set. You could easily lose your rights and be deemed a terrorist tomorrow.
Click to expand...
The definition is clear.

A terrorist is someone who commits violent crimes to further a political motive.

The boston tea party *was* a terrorist act.

The vegas shooter was not, as far as anyone can prove.

These rioters are by definition terrorists.
 
Criticalt

Criticalt

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,629
Reaction score
16,307
Location
WNY
carpediem said:
Maybe a day could go by without somebody feeling the need to fight with/run from/harass the police. Hey, here's a stunning idea, don't want the cops to shoot you? Try not being a frickin career criminal! Amazing! Millions who aren't criminals have never been shot by the cops. Silly me, it's their right to be criminals, but we just need to get woke enough to stop interfering with that right.....
Why is this country heading down this retarded path? Lack of accountability and education. Free and easy welfare.
Disgusting......
Click to expand...
BLM is actively telling young black men to resist the police. Guilty or not they say to fight them all the way.
BLM absolutely, positively want, need and teach blacks how to die. Without black deaths at the hands of cops their movement would end and so would their money. Then, follow the money....all their donations go to rich white politicians.
BLM followers are for sure the dumbest of all the trash in this country today. I dont care whst color they are, they are idiots.
 
tirwin1

tirwin1

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
16,885
Reaction score
46,795
Location
rochester
Criticalt said:
BLM is actively telling young black men to resist the police. Guilty or not they say to fight them all the way.
BLM absolutely, positively want, need and teach blacks how to die. Without black deaths at the hands of cops their movement would end and so would their money. Then, follow the money....all their donations go to rich white politicians.
BLM followers are for sure the dumbest of all the trash in this country today. I dont care whst color they are, they are idiots.
Click to expand...
I would bet every cop in the country is thinking about how to avoid shooting a black man these days and goes out of their way to avoid any possible confrontation. Yet these incidents keep on happening. It does make you wonder what the hell is going on.
 
drowhawk

drowhawk

.44 mag
Messages
973
Reaction score
1,403
Location
Livingston
I agree they are terrorists. I am torn on whether or not they should be treated as combatants or not. I think it would set a dangerous precedent that your rights can be stripped of you at any time simply because of your affiliation with one of these groups. On the other hand, I think that it would be a fitting punishment to give these kids a taste of what true socialism is like.
 
Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
7,917
Reaction score
15,456
Location
Rochester
tirwin1 said:
I would bet every cop in the country is thinking about how to avoid shooting a black man these days and goes out of their way to avoid any possible confrontation. Yet these incidents keep on happening. It does make you wonder what the hell is going on.
Click to expand...


It's quite simple.

The black men haven't gotten the memo. They are being actively told to seek out police and cause trouble, or to attack police if they are caught doing something illegal.

It's almost like a certain group who shall remain nameless, but whose initials rhyme with "bee", "ell", and "emm", WANT black people to die.
 
Blimey

Blimey

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
11,274
Reaction score
16,251
Location
Western NY
Shadow2 said:
No i don't get it. Simply deeming assholes terrorists is a bad precedent to set. You could easily lose your rights and be deemed a terrorist tomorrow.
Click to expand...
There is a definition of terrorist. Some of these "protesters" and BLM supporters are actual terrorists. They are using violence and intimidation to seek political change.
 
Celt

Celt

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
20,132
Location
Westchester
Shadow2 said:
I don't think Police or Military should be shooting civilians. Not good. What should be happening is the locals should be the ones to use deadly force to protect their lives and property. That way it cant be used against the police or government.
Click to expand...
Only problem is the govt will use that against civilians to push more gun control and less freedom... its sad, because i agree that citizens should be standing up to defend life and property.
 
H

holdover

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
16,702
Reaction score
24,764
Location
occupied NY
Thats Rich, I dont know where she gets off with that. it was'nt trump supporters that tore down statues beat white people on the street looted and burned down white businesses and police precincts, threaten the president and called for violent revolution.
 
Last edited:
spat

spat

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
29,805
Reaction score
62,786
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
Elwood said:
I believe Nancy Pelosi did just that a few days ago, labeled all trump supporters as domestic terrorists. It’s that slippery slope, when you start throwing hyperbole around. It can go both ways.
Click to expand...
But, us avoiding calling actual terrorists terrorists will not prevent them from calling you a terrorist over your thought crime later.

The right has spent half a century playing the appeasement game, and it's gotten us exactly where it got Neville Chamberlain.

Now we finally managed to elect a Winston Churchill, and we'd better follow his lead and kick some ass and quit worrying about who's feelings we're going to hurt doing it.

We need to get to where socialists to be afraid to admit they are socialists because *they'll* get cancelled.

You do not win wars by "following the rules" better than your enemies. You win them obliterating the opposition.
 
E

Elwood

.223 Rem
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
2,266
Location
The Evil Empire
spat said:
But, us avoiding calling actual terrorists terrorists will not prevent them from calling you a terrorist over your thought crime later.

The right has spent half a century playing the appeasement game, and it's gotten us exactly where it got Neville Chamberlain.

Now we finally managed to elect a Winston Churchill, and we'd better follow his lead and kick some ass and quit worrying about who's feelings we're going to hurt doing it.

We need to get to where socialists to be afraid to admit they are socialists because *they'll* get cancelled.

You do not win wars by "following the rules" better than your enemies. You win them obliterating the opposition.
Click to expand...
True, I tend to lean towards the philosophy of the great Theodore Roosevelt,
“speak softly and carry a big stick”
1599153072841.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top