California’s 10 round mag ban injunction upheld.

[Saltwater60]

I do t want to get too excited here, but it could be of i trest to us.

NRA-ILA | Federal Court Upholds Decision to Block California’s Magazine Ban

 

[Celt]

I saw that too, but heres the problem I see. The 9th is radically liberal. I think they upheld it so that this wont go to a Trump Scotus. If the state doesnt appeal this decision then it stands for Ca only. Someone correct me if I read this wrong, but Id have preferred the 9th to lift the injunction so the gun rights group would take it to scotus.

 

[Rethin]

No, upholding the injunction just means the lower court didn't overstep its bounds. Its not a ruling on the merits of the injunction. Furthermore the lower court has yet to decide on the case.

This particular case is in its infancy.

 

[Edwardteach72]

I saw that too, but heres the problem I see. The 9th is radically liberal. I think they upheld it so that this wont go to a Trump Scotus. If the state doesnt appeal this decision then it stands for Ca only. Someone correct me if I read this wrong, but Id have preferred the 9th to lift the injunction so the gun rights group would take it to scotus.

You may be onto something with your thinking.

The same tactic was done when D.C. lost its case to prevent issuing carry licenses. Instead of appealing the decision which would have caused it to go in front of the SCOTUS and the chance of them agreeing that "may issue" is unconstitutional mandating every state to go to a shall issue

 

[Celt]

No, upholding the injunction just means the lower court didn't overstep its bounds. Its not a ruling on the merits of the injunction. Furthermore the lower court has yet to decide on the case.

This particular case is in its infancy.

Ok, thanks for clarifying.