California ... Mandatory Firearm Liability Insurance To Own Guns Introduced!
- Thread starter livingston
- Start date
Jmac00
.475 A&M Magnum
how does this work if no insurance company that offers this type of policy, this is unconstitutional, period
so if a drunk steals my car and kills a family, Im I still liable
so if a drunk steals my car and kills a family, Im I still liable
Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
what if all the insurance companies do not offer it ..
Bigfoot
.475 A&M Magnum
It's all so tiresome. Fuck them.
They can sign all the papers they want to.
Some people just don't give a fuck anymore.
The Democrat politicians and their supporters can eat shit.
They can sign all the papers they want to.
Some people just don't give a fuck anymore.
The Democrat politicians and their supporters can eat shit.
As Cooolone said above.
It doesn't matter if it is offered or not. This, and mandatory "fees", etc., that cost you money are unConstitutional "poll taxes" on your Right to bear arms.
It is merely one more way they attempt to restrict what they are not allowed to infringe AT ALL.
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
spat
.950 JDJ
NY outlawed it, and CA wants to make it mandatory.
It's almost like the gun grabbers have no clue what they're doing.
No, these are two very different things. What California wants is liability insurance that would cover any incident that might happen relating to any firearm you own, whether it was your fault or not.
What New York banned was legal insurance that would cover your legal fees in the event that you used your gun in self defense. This insurance would not cover a ND or any act committed by someone if they stole your gun.
spat
.950 JDJ
They're both insurance that covers you if someone sues you over a gun related issue.
No insurance covers intentional acts or crime.
Splitting hairs like that is going to be a nightmare in court. The insurance company for the CA stuff will find themselves defending exactly the same lawsuits that NY outlawed insurance for.
I disagree. What California wants is a policy that would pay out even if your gun was stolen and used in a crime. Only if you reported it stolen before the crime would you not be liable for it.
What New York banned would only pay your attorney fees for your defense in an act of self defense.
What New York banned would only pay your attorney fees for your defense in an act of self defense.
Jmac00
.475 A&M Magnum
will this apply to your car if your car is stolen by a drunk and kills someone, 'cause that where this is headed
what if someone steals my chain saw and cuts his leg off? Im I still liable
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
The indigenous urban inhabitants don't pay taxes nor will they get gun owners insurance.
Precisely why the rightful owners of the guns that the criminals stole and are shooting people with should be liable !
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Insurance companies will be on this like stink on a monkey. They're one cockroach higher up the ladder than lawyers.
RedBreast21
6.5 Creedmoor
Will there be a State assistance program for those too poor to afford insurance or does the State take the position that you have to be rich to afford a fundamental right in the Bill of Rights? Yeah...... this is not going to last long if passed.
In either case why should the government be allowed to intervene in a private contract between two parties that fully want to agree to said contract? Seems like more power grabbing bullshit to me.
spat
.950 JDJ
What would happen is you would be named in a lawsuit in any case your gun was used, and the insurance company would be dragged kicking and screaming into court, because they have the deep pockets.
What the policy is supposed to cover, and what they have to defend are not the same thing.
Jeep Owner Being Sued For $15 Million After Oil Change Accident Causes Mechanic’s Death
When you drop off your car at a dealership for an oil change, you expect to leave with your car with a fresh oil change. Unfortunately for one Michigan man, he is being sued for $15 million after h...
www.powernationtv.com