Chelsea Clinton thanks abortion for being good for the economy

[Dr. Evil]

Chelsea Clinton thanks abortion for being good for the economy

Too bad Hillary didn't add more to the economy oh, about 38 years ago.

 

[masterswimmer]

Just shows how eFing stupid CC is. I think Roe v Wade should have been fought on the premise of fiscal responsibility as opposed to a woman's right to choose. We'd see where that would have landed the SCOTUS decision.

 

[Deplorable Me]

Pro choice? Why don't people make better choices before sex? I never had a problem putting on a condom when I was drunk.

 

[BDinPutnam]

It's certainly been good to Planned Parenthood.

 

[HighlandLofts]

DEMOCRAP funded planned parenthood, they gave the democrap party what was it 30 million dollars out of the tax dollars that the democrap party gave them?

What a joke, but it isn't funny.

To bad chelshy wasn't aborted and thrown in a garbage can to be taken to a landfill site some where.

 

[Carlos Hathcock]

Pro choice? Why don't people make better choices before sex? I never had a problem putting on a condom when I was drunk.

I thank you for that.

 

[96coal449]

If the Clinton's were aborted our economy would've been much better off.
Is it still to late to abort them?

 

[Dr. Evil]

If the Clinton's were aborted our economy would've been much better off.
Is it still to late to abort them?

I'm good.

 

[Saltwater60]

All while saying we need to let immigrants in to work for us. So kill USA citizen, but let foreigners in. Makes sense? No.

 

[Criticalt]

I thank you for that.

Why? You cant get pregnant.

 

[Catskillkid]

Doesn't she have a child? Why didn't she abort that? You know, for the good of the economy and all.

I can see the argument being made that people popping out little mongrels who then go on the government dole isn't good for the economy. But there are better methods of birth control. Pills, shots, male and female condoms come to mind. I know there's more.

I'm not opposed to having women in the workforce but let's examine this a bit. By Chelsea's logic women started working en masse in the workforce after Roe v. Wade (they were in there before but let's humor her a bit). That adds 50% of the population to the workforce. Personally, I don't necessarily see that as adding to the economy. Rather doesn't this just reduce the value of labor for the men who made up the majority of the workforce prior to Roe v. Wade and therefore reduce economic possibilities and wages for all (male and female)? Similar to how importing immigrants will result in a larger labor pool which in turn will only drive down wages across the board (simple supply and demand, no?).

And while I'm not opposed to keeping the population in check, the Democrats are total hypocrites. Let's have as many abortions as we possibly can but wait let's import all the dregs from Third World shitholes to make up for the fact that we don't have a large enough population to keep the economy moving. It's counter-intuitive at best. If they were honest in their intentions and their support for abortions they would be setting up Planned Parenthood clinics in all of those Third World shitholes. I mean this seriously, I think it would do those shitholes a whole hell of a lot of good more than any other forms of aid.

Whenever a natural disaster of some sort hits those Third World hell holes they always clamor for food, medicine, etc. I never once see them send shipments of condoms, which is what they really need more than anything else.