spat
.700 Nitro Express
It's your view, not you individually, but you and the people who use your terminology.But here is the thing. You keep saying "my view" and "I am trying to show"...but I didn't make up any of the link articles. Those are the definitions that exist and I am going with them.
Why this whole marathon anyway?
My terminology isn't mine personally, it is a common set of definitions that I prefer over the ones you use.
"Your" framework isn't invalid, I just find it less useful than the one I prefer.
I find people using your framework float back and forth between "gnostic atheist" and "agnostic atheist" positions as it suits their argument by just saying "atheist" all the time. They obscure the faults in their reasoning this way. My framework prevents them from doing this. Anyone using your framework should be required to explicitly state whether they mean gnostic or agnostic whenever they say atheist. I find that cumbersome.
As far as why this has gone on so long, it's simple. It takes 2 to argue, and apparently we are both enjoying the discussion.