Democrats Gut Key NASA Policy to Replace it with Federal Election Takeover

M

ManualF150

.308 Win
Messages
4,836
Reaction score
8,835
Location
Cayuga
ArmedCorgi said:
It should be completely illegal to do something like that.
Click to expand...
I agree.

For some that may not know this, because of other governments and (mostly) private sector companies (*cough cough* SpaceX) sending copious amount of junk into orbit around the Earth, it will soon be impossible to have things like the Space Station due to the inherent risk of collision of even the small space debris traveling at high rates of speed.

I used to be a huge fan of NASA when I was a kid, that now is a bleak remembrance. My parents thought it was the least corrupt portion of the government.

Man, they can't keep their cotton-picking hands out of any portion of the government...
 
ArmedCorgi

ArmedCorgi

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,420
Reaction score
22,629
Location
Utahardia
Federalization of elections would completely negate having a union of states in the first place. It was my understanding that it was in the Constitution that elections are run by the states. Is that incorrect? If it is correct, then would there need to be an amendment to the Constitution to change that?
 
dsdmmat

dsdmmat

Donut Master
Moderator
Messages
11,591
Reaction score
26,429
Location
Alpha Quadrant, Sector 001
ArmedCorgi said:
Federalization of elections would completely negate having a union of states in the first place. It was my understanding that it was in the Constitution that elections are run by the states. Is that incorrect? If it is correct, then would there need to be an amendment to the Constitution to change that?
Click to expand...
Yes this bill if signed into law would violate the constitution. Like every gun law does
 
ArmedCorgi

ArmedCorgi

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
14,420
Reaction score
22,629
Location
Utahardia
dsdmmat said:
Yes this bill if signed into law would violate the constitution. Like every gun law does
Click to expand...
This seems like it has more gravity than gun laws. This would be the feds illegally taking power away from the states. I would think that would become a huge deal. Like good bye union, huge deal. I sincerely hope that a majority of the states wouldn't stand for the federalization of elections. We can assume that states controlled by democrats will go along with it, but I would hope the rest wouldn't.
 
Phazer

Phazer

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
9,959
Reaction score
21,287
Location
Province of Westchester
ArmedCorgi said:
Federalization of elections would completely negate having a union of states in the first place. It was my understanding that it was in the Constitution that elections are run by the states.
Click to expand...
You are correct. Written in plain English in the U.S. Constitution:

Article 2, section 1;

Clause 2:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
 
tirwin1

tirwin1

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
18,889
Reaction score
52,227
Location
rochester
Phazer said:
You are correct. Written in plain English in the U.S. Constitution:

Article 2, section 1;

Clause 2:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
Click to expand...
Plain language doesn't matter. These assholes have lawyers that will play all kinds of word games to get around what the constitution states. Remember "emanation of a penumbra"? That phrase created a "right" out of thin air.
 
Grimscale

Grimscale

.338 Win Mag
Messages
8,315
Reaction score
16,309
Location
Rochester
As I've said before.
The more they eliminate the Constitution, the more they eliminate even the appearance of being legit.
once it's gone, no one needs to listen to them, nor follow their illegal demands.
It becomes "might makes right", and they only think they have the full backing of the military.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top