Oh shoot, that was true 2 years ago.Your math/skills is off once again.
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America | History & Text
A thousand pardons.
Oh shoot, that was true 2 years ago.Your math/skills is off once again.
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America | History & Text
Whats the big deal?
Or, more appropriately, you must swear that God is make believe.You don't see a problem with an unconstitutional practice being forced upon those that do not wish to participate?
I can see your point , but your being rather dramatic about it. Nothing is being done to you .
And nobody is getting upset about anything. Except maybe those crying persecution again.
Only one I see crying persecution is you . You don't belive in God , Whats the big deal? Its like choosing a color for Christ's sake. We all have to swear to the color blue now. You have more of an argument with that because you can see blue! your making an argument about something which doesn't exists offends you . Its kind of silly .
Your like a Jewish person complaining about the Nazi flag on the other side of Pluto.
.
This would be easier if the justice for breaking an oath was handed our by real, tangible individuals.Is an oath taken, based on or supported by something you do not believe in, still binding?
If you were to swear an oath that, at the end, says "so help me Cuomo" would you feel some moral responsibility to ensure you do not break that oath?
Many won't.
however, banning "So help me, God," is not the correct action to take.
If a person is religious, this should be allowed. AS LONG AS THEY DO NOT ATTEMPT TO CODIFY THEIR RELIGION INTO OUR LAWS.
If you are a true believer, and wish to live your life by a moral code, I respect you. If you expect me to follow your religion, and yes, forcing me to say "So help me, God," when I do not believe in Him is forcing me to follow your religion, that is where this whole thing fails.
This is the problem I've been seeing in this whole discussion. One sides wants all to use their religious terms and deities, and the other side wants absolutely NO religious terms or deities involved.
IT IS UP TO THE INDIVIDUAL.
As mentioned previously in this thread, it is no different than if you elect not to swear on a Bible in Court. I would rather you swear on something that has meaning to YOU.
And then I will judge you by your actions, not your words.
Is an oath taken, based on or supported by something you do not believe in, still binding?
If you were to swear an oath that, at the end, says "so help me Cuomo" would you feel some moral responsibility to ensure you do not break that oath?
Many won't.
however, banning "So help me, God," is not the correct action to take.
If a person is religious, this should be allowed. AS LONG AS THEY DO NOT ATTEMPT TO CODIFY THEIR RELIGION INTO OUR LAWS.
If you are a true believer, and wish to live your life by a moral code, I respect you. If you expect me to follow your religion, and yes, forcing me to say "So help me, God," when I do not believe in Him is forcing me to follow your religion, that is where this whole thing fails.
This is the problem I've been seeing in this whole discussion. One sides wants all to use their religious terms and deities, and the other side wants absolutely NO religious terms or deities involved.
IT IS UP TO THE INDIVIDUAL.
As mentioned previously in this thread, it is no different than if you elect not to swear on a Bible in Court. I would rather you swear on something that has meaning to YOU.
And then I will judge you by your actions, not your words.
"I would rather you swear on something that has meaning to YOU."
Oh, like a Pink Floyd album.
Robin
The only problem with this reasoning is that the vast majority of people in prison do read the bible and believe in everything associated with it WELL before they end up in prison. Again what you believe in doesn't dictate your actions. Your actions are simply your actions.
How about swearing an oath to something more tangible , like your right hand?
Good thing Rights aren't given by God. Nor are they given by the Constitution.I guess if you remove god then you don't have any god given rights, they can do what they want to ya.
They come from nature and people. Stuff like self defense is as easy as observing creatures in nature and their various defense mechanisms. Laws/rights come from people. Societies decide what's most beneficial for their particular situation hence why laws are different all over the world. Do some reading on negative vs positive rights.Then where do they come from?
Robin
How about swearing on something more desirable.
"I pledge allegiance to the United States of America, and to the Flag that represents it, on my honor."
QUOTE]
Nahhhhhhhhh , Those fucktards have no honor, but they have hands.
In which schools are bibles not allowed?
Then he's pretty poor at protecting his children...I don't like to be negative, but I'm positive we are loosing our rights, our God given rights as described by our founders.
Robin
From my understanding thats not how it works. If or when it comes time to actually bear arms in restoring those Liberties maybe you will get it, maybe.Then he's pretty poor at protecting his children...