Deputy sheriff enters IRS office to ask a question & guard pulls gun on him
- Thread starter ProgSpear
- Start date
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
The cop made it a race issue.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
MYbe it’s just my dads department, but that was up until the day he retired in April. They have to use sick time or they pay for private disability insurance.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Time off??!!??!!? C'mon, how long does it take to change your underwear.
Robin
Robin
Bigfoot
.475 A&M Magnum
The article refers to the guard as "the deputy"
Then a member here refers to the deputy as "the sheriff"
It's almost like words don't matter anymore.
Facepalm
Then a member here refers to the deputy as "the sheriff"
It's almost like words don't matter anymore.
Facepalm
Shadow2
6.5 Creedmoor
Pointing out statistical fact is Anti cop? Sounds like Liberal logic to me. Law enforcement pull their guns for dam near everything so statistically the guy has done it to someone who has not deserved it at some point. It was a shitty feeling i bet. I have no sympathy for him.
A cop being treated like everyone else ... Boohoo, pulls race card, needs time off what a pussy. If that's law enforcement then yes I'm anti cop ... bunch of entitled little bitches.
A cop being treated like everyone else ... Boohoo, pulls race card, needs time off what a pussy. If that's law enforcement then yes I'm anti cop ... bunch of entitled little bitches.
Last edited:
What statistical fact did you point out?
Unless you went back and edited the old post I quoted, you pointed out nothing but your own stupidity.
Unless you went back and edited the old post I quoted, you pointed out nothing but your own stupidity.
Here we go to make sure you can’t edit it.
What statistic did you point out here? It must be there since you said so, but I don’t speak retard so I’m having trouble finding it.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Hahaha
Shadow2
6.5 Creedmoor
Crime in the U.S. 2015 Based on the data Statisticaly 32% of police in high crime areas fire their guns. Lucky for me i have a function brain and think for myself and the using percentage one can can extrapolate the number of pulled guns would be far higher. I estimate 90%. That leaves 58% pulled guns where no shots where fired. No worries FBI is currently compiling us of force data Use-of-Force — FBI) How many of those people didn't deserve its safe to say plenty.
You can piss and moan all you like law enforcement pulls their guns at the drop of the hat. This COP experienced what many american experience in this country. NO i don't feel sorry for cops. Law enforcement and this push for a police state for public safety created this environment.
edit my post I have no problems posting it in BOLD.
You can piss and moan all you like law enforcement pulls their guns at the drop of the hat. This COP experienced what many american experience in this country. NO i don't feel sorry for cops. Law enforcement and this push for a police state for public safety created this environment.
edit my post I have no problems posting it in BOLD.
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
So your 32% statistic is based on actual data- that's good!
What type of analysis and what data did you use to come up with your 90% and 58% numbers?
Absent an underlying dataset and some kind of statistical methodology, they're... hypothesis/conjecture at best.
ETA you also extrapolate those numbers from the 32% number which appears to be based on "high crime area" data. So really even if your 90/58 numbers are derived via a sound methodology they only apply to "high crime areas."
What type of analysis and what data did you use to come up with your 90% and 58% numbers?
Absent an underlying dataset and some kind of statistical methodology, they're... hypothesis/conjecture at best.
ETA you also extrapolate those numbers from the 32% number which appears to be based on "high crime area" data. So really even if your 90/58 numbers are derived via a sound methodology they only apply to "high crime areas."
Haha “I extrapolate and say 90%”.
You posted a website then started making up numbers.
Got it.
You hate cops, just say it. It’s much easier than putting together a bullshit argument to hide something we all know is true. Be proud of your position at least. I’m proud of choosing cops over people like you and will never hide it.
You posted a website then started making up numbers.
Got it.
You hate cops, just say it. It’s much easier than putting together a bullshit argument to hide something we all know is true. Be proud of your position at least. I’m proud of choosing cops over people like you and will never hide it.
Shadow2
6.5 Creedmoor
I'm having breakfast with a retired cop as we speak ... but keep up with the if you don't kiss our ass, your against us angle. I'm not hear to kiss your ass or support you. I will point out hypocrisy and not give a dam if it hurts your tender ego.
"I'll revisit this debate when FBI use of force statistics is released that will not doubt confirm my findings.
You may want to take the next few days off for your emotional distress.
"I'll revisit this debate when FBI use of force statistics is released that will not doubt confirm my findings.
You may want to take the next few days off for your emotional distress.
Ask your dear friend how many times he used his gun to intimidate and harass people. Then extrapolate!
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
Your made up numbers are still only based on "high crime areas"- so your 90/58 (even assuming they are correct) only apply to those areas.
E the massive
.308 Win
Here is the body cam of responding police.
subsonic
.44 mag
Ok, so the security guard was an idiot, but the IRS office is a gun-free zone, so the idiot is right about that isn’t he?
Now, obviously uniformed ON-DUTY cops need to keep their gun on them while they go about their business. So if they’re buying their donuts or whatever that they need to get through the day that makes sense.
But a licensed-to-carry private citizen doesn’t get to strap on their gun when they go to question the revenuers about their own tax business. It seems like this cop wanted special treatment and to use his badge for an advantage with Uncle Sam.
If the poor threatened taxmen at the IRS disarm Joe Lawabiding Citizen when they come to do their own business in a gunfree zone and handle their personal tax matters I don’t see why that should change because Joe happens to be a cop.
Although I am very sympathetic if he wanted to ask a quick question during a break, it seems like a goose gander situation. If you’re not going to let the public carry, then this cop can find a bathroom to change his clothes and leave his gun in the car.
Now, obviously uniformed ON-DUTY cops need to keep their gun on them while they go about their business. So if they’re buying their donuts or whatever that they need to get through the day that makes sense.
But a licensed-to-carry private citizen doesn’t get to strap on their gun when they go to question the revenuers about their own tax business. It seems like this cop wanted special treatment and to use his badge for an advantage with Uncle Sam.
If the poor threatened taxmen at the IRS disarm Joe Lawabiding Citizen when they come to do their own business in a gunfree zone and handle their personal tax matters I don’t see why that should change because Joe happens to be a cop.
Although I am very sympathetic if he wanted to ask a quick question during a break, it seems like a goose gander situation. If you’re not going to let the public carry, then this cop can find a bathroom to change his clothes and leave his gun in the car.