What started off as a good cause will be soon labeled “Terrorist group”. People don’t learn.
The original protesting when Floyd was mistakenly killed due to ego to spite the onlookers , was a good cause.What is this "good cause" you're speaking of?
The "Black Lives Matter" movement was borne out of lies. It was the false narrative that Trayvon was murdered. It was the false "hands up, don't shoot" Michael Brown narrative. Eric Garner? It wasn't a "choke hold" that killed him. It was him fighting with the police at 400 pounds with asthma and heart disease.
Show me a REAL case of racism or police brutality, and I'll stand with you to denounce it. Unfortunately, the biggest victim here is usually the truth.
What is this "good cause" you're speaking of?
The "Black Lives Matter" movement was borne out of lies. It was the false narrative that Trayvon was murdered. It was the false "hands up, don't shoot" Michael Brown narrative. Eric Garner? It wasn't a "choke hold" that killed him. It was him fighting with the police at 400 pounds with asthma and heart disease.
Show me a REAL case of racism or police brutality, and I'll stand with you to denounce it. Unfortunately, the biggest victim here is usually the truth.
That was detective work. How would that be fishing?Son Of Sam was caught because of parking tickets!!! Was that fishing or good police work?
So you think that a cop should have to pay for his own defense every time some POS dirtbag files some frivolous excessive force claim? That would be a perfect way to make sure NOBODY ever goes into law enforcement. I guess that would be a way to defund them in a roundabout way.I don’t think the black community wants to abolish the police. I think they want to defund the police union and see more accountability when a officer have committed a crime (NYPD). When a cop is being sued, let that cop pay for his defense not the union nor the tax payers is what I think they want. I also agree but think that law enforcement officers should get funded more and get more training tactically and socially. Can’t expect to get a Gucci AR with $25.
I don’t think the black community wants to abolish the police. I think they want to defund the police union and see more accountability when a officer have committed a crime (NYPD). When a cop is being sued, let that cop pay for his defense not the union nor the tax payers is what I think they want. I also agree but think that law enforcement officers should get funded more and get more training tactically and socially. Can’t expect to get a Gucci AR with $25.
this is called a car jacking, its a felony...... Do whatever you need to doOpens up some new sporting events
So you think that a cop should have to pay for his own defense every time some POS dirtbag files some frivolous excessive force claim? That would be a perfect way to make sure NOBODY ever goes into law enforcement. I guess that would be a way to defund them in a roundabout way.
Obviously not, there are good cops who get accused of BS claims that don’t stick and there are some who have a repeated history of one particular violation but stay on the job. Some probably get dealt with some probably not. Did you guys read what I posted or just skipped it? Like I said I “THINK” they want to defund the police union and see more accountability when a officer “HAVE COMMITED” a crime. The job is already stressful enough and having politicians playing politics with policing isn’t going to make it better nor easier. That’s why I said LEO should get funded more to get more training rather than cutting it to make shit worse.What legal basis would there be to disallow only cops to have unions? That makes zero sense (like much else going on).
I did read your whole post, and you said ”I also agree, but..." The "I also agree" came right after you said "they" want cops to pay for their own defense. So, either your post was poorly worded, or you're backtracking, which is fine, but just admit it. I've jumped to conclusions before I've looked at all angles, and in hindsight, I was wrong. No harm in that.Obviously not, there are good cops who get accused of BS claims that don’t stick and there are some who have a repeated history of one particular violation but stay on the job. Some probably get dealt with some probably not. Did you guys read what I posted or just skipped it? Like I said I “THINK” they want to defund the police union and see more accountability when a officer “HAVE COMMITED” a crime. The job is already stressful enough and having politicians playing politics with policing isn’t going to make it better nor easier. That’s why I said LEO should get funded more to get more training rather than cutting it to make shit worse.
Every other professional does.So you think that a cop should have to pay for his own defense every time some POS dirtbag files some frivolous excessive force claim? That would be a perfect way to make sure NOBODY ever goes into law enforcement. I guess that would be a way to defund them in a roundabout way.
Only cops ? none.What legal basis would there be to disallow only cops to have unions? That makes zero sense (like much else going on).
Yeah it was poorly worded.I did read your whole post, and you said ”I also agree, but..." The "I also agree" came right after you said "they" want cops to pay for their own defense. So, either your post was poorly worded, or you're backtracking, which is fine, but just admit it. I've jumped to conclusions before I've looked at all angles, and in hindsight, I was wrong. No harm in that.
It looks to me that most of the white people that are saying abolish the police.
Are exactly the type that when push comes to shove would need the police the most.
Right. So only billionaires have the right to political clout. Emphatic eyeroll inserted here.Only cops ? none.
All public sector employees, maybe. Government is a special beast as an employer. It is a legally mandated monopoly on nearly everything it does, and management is voted on by the general public.
Maybe there shouldn't be any public sec unions allowed. Certainly none of them should be allowed to engage in anything remotely like political activity.
And I would assume that the fringe group that do want to abolish the police.I assume most do not want to abolish the police.