I would only need one.
I would only need one.
he was found by a jury of his peers to be guilty and dangerous to society. Thats not the same as the government arbitrarily deciding to execute this manNot saying it to be a dick and I won't get into it too much, but I don't like capital punishment under any scenario in which the person doesn't pose a legitimate threat (he no longer does). It's not because I believe he deserves to live, or has any chance of ever being a decent person. Has nothing to do with him in fact. It's my libertarian streak that I think it represents an overreach of government power. I just don't like the idea that the government can decide to kill one of its citizens--except in the aforementioned scenario in which it must kill to protect (e.g. military or armed police).
Seriously? On a sub-human that was justly convicted of the heinous and cold-blooded murder of innocent defenseless people?Wondering, seriously...
How many could really pull the trigger to a man tied to a pole stuck in the ground?
That sounds like contrition. Maybe a bit of a silver lining then, if one can exist in such a horrible situation. It's just awful. The whole thing is awful.He stated that he will not file any appeals.
He also said he will not accept any from others either.
This is the sentence that he wanted. Glad he got what he wished for.
That sounds like contrition. Maybe a bit of a silver lining then, if one can exist in such a horrible situation. It's just awful. The whole thing is awful.
My brother lives in Charleston. He was downtown when the shootings happened. He was telling me how gracefully everyone behaved in the aftermath. The church leaders asked the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons to please go home- that they would handle it by themselves.
It's heartbreaking. So many lives destroyed.
Not saying it to be a dick and I won't get into it too much, but I don't like capital punishment under any scenario in which the person doesn't pose a legitimate threat (he no longer does). It's not because I believe he deserves to live, or has any chance of ever being a decent person. Has nothing to do with him in fact. It's my libertarian streak that I think it represents an overreach of government power. I just don't like the idea that the government can decide to kill one of its citizens--except in the aforementioned scenario in which it must kill to protect (e.g. military or armed police).
he was found by a jury of his peers to be guilty and dangerous to society. Thats not the same as the government arbitrarily deciding to execute this man