gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
This is great. This stuff is finally coming out.
Long article but a good read. Author is rational and put a lot of time into it.This is a more reasoned article in my opinion.
Skeptical of Voter Fraud in 2020? Here's Your Evidence.
[Updated Nov 25th at 2:55 PM MST] Has anyone ever told you that “You can’t do it” and “You’re crazy” over and over? Perhaps they’ve told you this so many times, you’ve started to believe it yourself. This is what’s happening in our election today. The media is telling us “There is no evidence...thomisticthinker.com
I hope the things coming out are enough for the ones here that kept asking where's the evidence. I'm sure it's not but. Here you have it. The floodgates are opening.
Emma Rechenberg thoughNewsmaxTV Breaks Cone of Silence, Millions Hear Story There First | Minds
...re First. Subscribe to @deepcapture on Mindswww.minds.com
This is a shorter read for ya!Long article but a good read. Author is rational and put a lot of time into it.
I see it differently. We'll see.Somebody should ask him how is buddy is doing on the lawsuit that will be of biblical proportions, will blow up GA and release the Kraken, lol...
I get it that these things take time... I also get the old adage "time to put up or shut up" or "where the rubber meets the road" ... etc. Personally I think she has done more harm than good taking this to the podcast circuit and am not surprised in the least that Trump has distanced himself from her. Many bold promises seemingly yet to be fulfilled...
I see it differently. We'll see.
I hear you. I will just say this. I am not an attorney. She is. She is a fairly accomplished attorney. I will defer to experts on how they handle their business as they see fit as long as the results are what we all desire. Feel the same way about Trump. I may not agree with the approach all of the time but I like the outcome.All I'm saying is she'd have been much better off focusing on the legalese and not making repeated promises that have yet to been met in the court of public opinion.
I think this is a battle being fought on many fronts. I don't know the reasoning, but I have no doubt Powell is working and coordinating with Trump's team, regardless of who is paying the bills.All I'm saying is she'd have been much better off focusing on the legalese and not making repeated promises that have yet to been met in the court of public opinion.
I hear you. I will just say this. I am not an attorney. She is. She is a fairly accomplished attorney. I will defer to experts on how they handle their business as they see fit as long as the results are what we all desire. Feel the same way about Trump. I may not agree with the approach all of the time but I like the outcome.
Again, if the desired outcome is achieved I could care less how it was. Like I said, we will eventually see.Not an attorney either but have been involved in a lot of litigation over the years... my particular experience was cases were never discussed with those who did not have an absolute need to know and certainly not with the public.
I think this is a battle being fought on many fronts. I don't know the reasoning, but I have no doubt Powell is working and coordinating with Trump's team, regardless of who is paying the bills.
This is not a private lawsuit, this is a very public matter where the public has a vested interest. I'll admit I don't like the sensationalism attached to what Powell has been saying, but as far as keeping the public informed, in this instance, a certain amount of disclosure is needed.Not an attorney either but have been involved in a lot of litigation over the years... my particular experience was cases were never discussed with those who did not have an absolute need to know and certainly not with the public.
The key words are, "So far." Again, we will find out if it was smart or not.I happen to agree with you. I just think if you make bold statements to the public at some point you need to follow through with it. So far hasn't delivered.