Fact Check: 'Caged' Child Photo Is Not What Immigration Advocates Claim
WHAT YOU SAW
WHAT YOU DIDN'T SEE
WHAT YOU SAW
WHAT YOU DIDN'T SEE
Fact Check: ‘Caged’ Child Photo Is Not What Immigration Advocates Claim
- Thread starter CaseHardened
- Start date
Jose Antonio Vargas is one of them. He is illegal. Been here more than half his life and still not allowed, legally to be here.
Time for ICE to hunt him down and remove him by force.
He is Philippino, I wonder what would happen to him if he actually went home and fought the corrupt government of his own country?
Wonder why he is so worried about the US and not of his own Nation?
One more POS!
Time for ICE to hunt him down and remove him by force.
He is Philippino, I wonder what would happen to him if he actually went home and fought the corrupt government of his own country?
Wonder why he is so worried about the US and not of his own Nation?
One more POS!
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Fact Check: 'Caged' Child Photo Is Not What Immigration Advocates Claim
WHAT YOU SAW
WHAT YOU DIDN'T SEE
priceless 
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
This is the next gotcha issue the liberals run on in the next two elections ....
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
I guess they just don't see they do more harm with the fake news than if they just tell the truth no one want to see family's separated but you come here illegal you have broken the law and there are consequences temporary separation from your kid was the choice you made.
I wonder how much money the dems are pumping into media down in South America to tell people to keep coming or to not tell them what is happening when they get here.
The fact that Trump is now using the laws the Liberal writes against them and they can't do a damn thing about it.
So now Trump will get to fix the the immigration system that the Democrats broke many years ago.
I wonder how much money the dems are pumping into media down in South America to tell people to keep coming or to not tell them what is happening when they get here.
The fact that Trump is now using the laws the Liberal writes against them and they can't do a damn thing about it.
So now Trump will get to fix the the immigration system that the Democrats broke many years ago.
The Media's lies work though.
I would bet 40% or more average citizens still believe George Zimmerman shot a little kid:
I would bet 40% or more average citizens still believe George Zimmerman shot a little kid:
Deplorable Me
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Remember what the media did to the American public during the Vietnam war? The level of propaganda has gotten above that point now.
Not just to the American Public.
To American Soldiers, the Vietnamese People (North & South), and the Cambodians who were soon slaughtered by the Thousands.
Khmer Rouge Killing Fields - Wikipedia
Last edited:
Cleck
.308 Win
Thanks for this. Saw this stupid pic this morning and wanted to say something, but I didn't wanna be that angry that early. I at least wanna get on the road before someone pisses me off.
Went and looked it up, shared this with some friends. I can already feel the hate from the fact check coming through my phone
Went and looked it up, shared this with some friends. I can already feel the hate from the fact check coming through my phone
Steal2B
.700 Nitro Express
Celt
.338 Win Mag
unfortunately, more than half the people in this country are freaking idiots.. useful idiots. they believe everything the news feeds them and they won't bother looking up any information to verify the crazy stuff the media puts out there.
One of my wife's friends told her (before the election), that Donald Trump wanted to take away everyone's PETS.
She read it on FaceBook.
And still believes it.
She's a Democrat.
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I'm going to bury my cat right now. No one will ever find her.
Celt
.338 Win Mag
Its amazing to me how much faith humans put into strangers. Seriously, people listen to the news and assume its fact. Its multi faceted, but it starts with the schooling system. And since schools are liberal brainwashing institutions now, they support a lying and manipulative media. We need to take the schools back so we can teach our kids to be free thinkers, and to always verify what they are learning, hearing, reading, seeing, etc... We do with our kids, but many people do not.
Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Time to have a boating accident. Just me and my cat.
I wonder how they got that kid to cry.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Democrats’ Border Separation Bill Would Let Nearly All Parents Who Commit Federal Crimes Get Off Scot-Free
Every Senate Democrat has signed on to cosponsor a bill written so carelessly that it does not distinguish between foreign children at the border and U.S. citizen children.
By Gabriel Malor
;
By Gabriel Malor
June 19, 2018
Democrats’ proposed legislation to prohibit so-called border separations would actually prevent federal law enforcement agencies almost anywhere inside the United States from arresting and detaining criminals who are parents having nothing to do with unlawfully crossing the border and seeking asylum.
Every Senate Democrat has now signed on to cosponsor a bill written so carelessly that it does not distinguish between migrant children at the border and U.S. citizen children already within the United States. The bill further does not distinguish between federal officers handling the border crisis and federal law enforcement pursuing the ordinary course of their duties.
Let’s break down Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s proposed “Keep Families Together Act” to see where Democrats went wrong. The bill provides that “[a]n agent or officer of a designated agency shall be prohibited from removing a child from his or her parent or legal guardian at or near the port of entry or within 100 miles of the border of the United States” (with three exceptions to be discussed later). Four immediate warning signs in this provision should put the reader on notice that this bill is not what Democrats claim.
First, “designated agency” here is defined as the entirety of the federal departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and Health and Human Services. The scope of the bill is not limited to those portions of these departments involved with the border crisis, and there is no other limiting factor in the bill that would cabin the prohibition on family separation to immigration-related matters. In other words, this bill is going to regulate conduct across a great many federal offices that have nothing to do with separating children from families arriving unlawfully in the United States.
Second, “agent or officer” is not defined by the legislation, except to say that it includes contractors. Federal law, however, already defines “officer” to include (with exceptions not relevant here) every federal employee appointed to the civil service by the head of an executive agency and ultimately overseen by the head of an executive agency.
Here again, this bill is not limited to controlling the behavior of the DHS, DOJ, or HHS officers involved in the border crisis. The proposed law would apply with equal force to, say, FBI agents (part of DOJ), Secret Service agents (part of DHS), and Centers for Disease Control officers (part of HHS) in the exercise of their everyday duties.
Third, “at or near the port of entry or within 100 miles of the border” does not meaningfully limit the geographic scope of this bill. That area includes almost the entirety of the geographical territory of the United States and the vast majority of people living in it. Two hundred million people live within 100 miles of the border. That’s roughly two-thirds of the U.S. population. Even more live near ports of entry, including in places far from the border crisis, like Salt Lake City, Utah (nearly 700 miles from the nearest border crossing), Tulsa, Oklahoma (more than 600 miles from the nearest border crossing), and Nashville, Tennessee (nearly 600 miles from the nearest border crossing). All major U.S. metropolitan areas fall within either 100 miles of the border or are near a port of entry or both.
Finally, “child” is defined in this legislation as any individual who has not reached 18 years old who has no permanent immigration status. This astonishing definition includes U.S. citizens under the age of 18. Citizen children by definition have no immigration status, permanent or otherwise. (Even if the Democrats belatedly amended this provision to restrict the definition to alien children without a permanent immigration status, that amended definition would still include non-migrant aliens, like tourist children, Deferred Action for Child Arrivals recipients under the age of 18, and children whose parents have had their immigration status revoked.)
Thus, far from addressing the border crisis, the Democrats’ Keep Families Together Act applies almost everywhere in the country to prohibit any DHS, DOJ, or HHS officer from removing almost any child from a parent. The listed exceptions to the prohibition—a state court authorizes separation, a state child welfare agency determines that the child is in danger, or certain DHS officials establish that the child is a victim of trafficking or is in danger from the parent, or that the parent is not the actual parent of the child—are completely unrelated to the vast majority of DHS, DOJ, and HHS enforcement activity.
More at ...Democrat Bill Would Let Parents Who Commit Fed Crimes Go Scot-Free
Every Senate Democrat has signed on to cosponsor a bill written so carelessly that it does not distinguish between foreign children at the border and U.S. citizen children.
By Gabriel Malor
;
By Gabriel Malor
June 19, 2018
Democrats’ proposed legislation to prohibit so-called border separations would actually prevent federal law enforcement agencies almost anywhere inside the United States from arresting and detaining criminals who are parents having nothing to do with unlawfully crossing the border and seeking asylum.
Every Senate Democrat has now signed on to cosponsor a bill written so carelessly that it does not distinguish between migrant children at the border and U.S. citizen children already within the United States. The bill further does not distinguish between federal officers handling the border crisis and federal law enforcement pursuing the ordinary course of their duties.
Let’s break down Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s proposed “Keep Families Together Act” to see where Democrats went wrong. The bill provides that “[a]n agent or officer of a designated agency shall be prohibited from removing a child from his or her parent or legal guardian at or near the port of entry or within 100 miles of the border of the United States” (with three exceptions to be discussed later). Four immediate warning signs in this provision should put the reader on notice that this bill is not what Democrats claim.
First, “designated agency” here is defined as the entirety of the federal departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and Health and Human Services. The scope of the bill is not limited to those portions of these departments involved with the border crisis, and there is no other limiting factor in the bill that would cabin the prohibition on family separation to immigration-related matters. In other words, this bill is going to regulate conduct across a great many federal offices that have nothing to do with separating children from families arriving unlawfully in the United States.
Second, “agent or officer” is not defined by the legislation, except to say that it includes contractors. Federal law, however, already defines “officer” to include (with exceptions not relevant here) every federal employee appointed to the civil service by the head of an executive agency and ultimately overseen by the head of an executive agency.
Here again, this bill is not limited to controlling the behavior of the DHS, DOJ, or HHS officers involved in the border crisis. The proposed law would apply with equal force to, say, FBI agents (part of DOJ), Secret Service agents (part of DHS), and Centers for Disease Control officers (part of HHS) in the exercise of their everyday duties.
Third, “at or near the port of entry or within 100 miles of the border” does not meaningfully limit the geographic scope of this bill. That area includes almost the entirety of the geographical territory of the United States and the vast majority of people living in it. Two hundred million people live within 100 miles of the border. That’s roughly two-thirds of the U.S. population. Even more live near ports of entry, including in places far from the border crisis, like Salt Lake City, Utah (nearly 700 miles from the nearest border crossing), Tulsa, Oklahoma (more than 600 miles from the nearest border crossing), and Nashville, Tennessee (nearly 600 miles from the nearest border crossing). All major U.S. metropolitan areas fall within either 100 miles of the border or are near a port of entry or both.
Finally, “child” is defined in this legislation as any individual who has not reached 18 years old who has no permanent immigration status. This astonishing definition includes U.S. citizens under the age of 18. Citizen children by definition have no immigration status, permanent or otherwise. (Even if the Democrats belatedly amended this provision to restrict the definition to alien children without a permanent immigration status, that amended definition would still include non-migrant aliens, like tourist children, Deferred Action for Child Arrivals recipients under the age of 18, and children whose parents have had their immigration status revoked.)
Thus, far from addressing the border crisis, the Democrats’ Keep Families Together Act applies almost everywhere in the country to prohibit any DHS, DOJ, or HHS officer from removing almost any child from a parent. The listed exceptions to the prohibition—a state court authorizes separation, a state child welfare agency determines that the child is in danger, or certain DHS officials establish that the child is a victim of trafficking or is in danger from the parent, or that the parent is not the actual parent of the child—are completely unrelated to the vast majority of DHS, DOJ, and HHS enforcement activity.
More at ...Democrat Bill Would Let Parents Who Commit Fed Crimes Go Scot-Free
Bigfoot
.450/400 Nitro Ex
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Catskillkid
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Didn't you know that when it's time to bury your cats it's really time to dig them up.
If you can get your cat out on the open water you are a far better cat whisperer than me good sir. Hell, I so much as make the motion of the dreaded "spray bottle" and mine skitts around corners going 100mph!
Catskillkid
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I can't find them now but it's very similar to a lot of those fake Syrian refugee photos where they supposedly are "drowning" at sea but they're really just waist deep. The deep state propaganda runs deep my friends.
Why not just open up a shooting range the hole length of the boarder of Texas New Mexico and Arizona put up signs the clearly say "Live firing range do not enter."
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
all i can say is the DEMS and RINOS will implode if it ever got to the desk .. VETO the TRUMP HAMMER ..
The Rome Daily Sentinel, 06/20/2018 pg 1, quotes The Hill : “Asked if that meant Democrats would not support the bill backed by Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) to keep immigrant families together while seeking asylum on the US border, Schumer said they want to keep the focus on Trump.”
This whole issue is nothing but a political football game for the Democrats and the left leaning mainstream press despite the fact that Obama did the same thing. The hypocrisy is astounding. Integrity is obviously a stranger to Schumer and his followers. It makes me so proud not be a Democrat.
This whole issue is nothing but a political football game for the Democrats and the left leaning mainstream press despite the fact that Obama did the same thing. The hypocrisy is astounding. Integrity is obviously a stranger to Schumer and his followers. It makes me so proud not be a Democrat.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
He did mention something about grabbing pussy.