Feingold Admits Hillary “Could Use Executive Orders” to Restrict Second Amendment Rights

[Cavalier Knight]

In a new video released by Project Veritas Action, James O’Keefe exposes Hillary Clinton’s plan to ban all guns through an executive order. In the video, James O’Keefe attends a private top donor campaign fundraiser for progressive Wisconsin Senate candidate Russ Feingold. O’Keefe attended the fundraiser the same day that a Project Veritas journalist was burned in the Feingold campaign.

During the fundraiser, which was hosted by Clinton friend and donor Amy Rao at her home in Palo Alto, California, a Project Veritas journalist spoke with former Senator Feingold and his donors about gun control. When asked what Hillary Clinton would do about the Second Amendment, Feingold said without hesitation, “Well, there might be an executive order.”

http://bearingarms.com/jenn-j/2016/10/13/feingold-admits-hillary-could-use-executive-orders-to-restrict-second-amendment-rights/

 

[Phauxtoe]

Executive orders cant make new law, BUT it can incorrectly reinterpret existing laws.
Sort of like FUAC misusing message of Necessity.

 

[ProgSpear]

Clinton Camp Refused to ‘Fully Endorse’ New York Gun Control Law at Awards Dinner

Clinton Camp Refused to ‘Fully Endorse’ New York Gun Control Law at Awards Dinner

 

[garyv350]

If this was possible to do, don't you think the current administration would have done this already?

 

[JohnD13]

The only reason Clinton would not endorse the 'Safe Act' would be that it doesn't infringe enough on the 2nd ammendment. And it doesn't have her name on it.

 

[meketrefe]

Like we said in many posts before.

In many towns all over the country they have local ordinances and provisions than any further restrictions from the federal government will be nullified and any federal agents will be arrested if they try to enforce any BS against US constitutional rights. Remember this was the reaction of many towns and cities after the Mayors Against Ilegal gun circus started their tour of clowns across the USA. This tour did more to protect the 2A than any other tour in history. Thanks Blowmeberg!
In some cases they proposed mandatory Gun Ownership as part of their protection plan against violence and also federal government overreach.

Maine, Georgia, Utah Towns Consider Mandatory Gun Ownership

so, Hildawhore can go eat shit.

 

[Marine Cpl]

In a new video released by Project Veritas Action, James O’Keefe exposes Hillary Clinton’s plan to ban all guns through an executive order. In the video, James O’Keefe attends a private top donor campaign fundraiser for progressive Wisconsin Senate candidate Russ Feingold. O’Keefe attended the fundraiser the same day that a Project Veritas journalist was burned in the Feingold campaign.

During the fundraiser, which was hosted by Clinton friend and donor Amy Rao at her home in Palo Alto, California, a Project Veritas journalist spoke with former Senator Feingold and his donors about gun control. When asked what Hillary Clinton would do about the Second Amendment, Feingold said without hesitation, “Well, there might be an executive order.”

http://bearingarms.com/jenn-j/2016/10/13/feingold-admits-hillary-could-use-executive-orders-to-restrict-second-amendment-rights/

Cavalier, what's with all the dead space above the link?

Edit. I see it's white on white text now. That's strange.

 

[Celt]

If Hitlery is given the White House, and she forces a federal "assault weapon" ban down our throats; I wonder if that will be enough to ignite the fire in all the Patriots living in free states?

And because I'm notorious for beating the dead horse, our efforts were worthless here in New York. We all got fired up , we took time off work, lost pay, rallied, destroyed the lawn, and it got us nowhere. Now see, we already had restrictive laws here.

We were the first state to be raped of our rights after the Sandy Hook tragedy. Several other states followed suit and it pissed people off all over the country in anticipation of a federal level band. The threat of more gun control laws is constantly over head, and many states have even passed more laws further restricting private gun ownership. I gotta think that people who live in free states are not going to go down quietly if this is tried. And frankly I would love to see the uprising from it.

 

[Drinkthekoolaid]

If Hitlery is given the White House, and she forces a federal "assault weapon" ban down our throats; I wonder if that will be enough to ignite the fire in all the Patriots living in free states?

And because I'm notorious for beating the dead horse, our efforts were worthless here in New York. We all got fired up , we took time off work, lost pay, rallied, destroyed the lawn, and it got us nowhere. Now see, we already had restrictive laws here.

We were the first state to be raped of our rights after the Sandy Hook tragedy. Several other states followed suit and it pissed people off all over the country in anticipation of a federal level band. The threat of more gun control laws is constantly over head, and many states have even passed more laws further restricting private gun ownership. I gotta think that people who live in free states are not going to go down quietly if this is tried. And frankly I would love to see the uprising from it.

I think states like texas, alabama, Tennessee and out west will be much angrier than we were. They have lots of freedoms now we do not.

Imagine living in a state where you can just buy a pistol. Or walk around with an AR on your back.

Yea they say "change is scary" and to live in that enviornment and go from those freedoms to dealing with federal gun grabbers will anger those people tremendously.

In NY, we knew it was inevitable. We have been dying by paper cuts for a while now. We are like the frog slowly being boiled, while those free states are the living frog being put in boiling water.

Sigh.....Another reason I want to move, be surrounded by others that have similar views.

 

[Cooolone]

Yawn...

The Executive and Laws... Has nothing to do with a RIGHT... But let's see what she's got?

 

[Drinkthekoolaid]

Yawn...

The Executive and Laws... Has nothing to do with a RIGHT... But let's see what she's got?

I used to think that way but I've observed laws and rules only apply to some people. If we lived in a country where the rule of law was justly applied, Hillary would be in jail, and Obama would have been impeached. This country now thinks it's ok to use the IRS to target political opponnents and legislate with a pen.

 

[Cooolone]

I used to think that way but I've observed laws and rules only apply to some people. If we lived in a country where the rule of law was justly applied, Hillary would be in jail, and Obama would have been impeached. This country now thinks it's ok to use the IRS to target political opponnents and legislate with a pen.

Thinking what should be and what is are two entirely distinct and different things.

Thinking or feeling someone has committed a criminal act, requiring prosecution and conviction is a very long stretch from talking about something I'm endowed with at birth and protected by in this REPUBLIC by that funny little document signifying those very inalienable Rights so noted. Let's not confuse the two... The 2nd Amendment has strengthened of late, DESPITE what you read, ever so slightly, but still the same. And more States continue to expand and protect those Rights as well. More and more, Constitutional Carry, Shall Isuue and more are being incorporated. Don't let the Cuomostan effect your thinking... Jade your thoughts.