Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
It feels the same to me as a 19 recoil wise. Maybe your hands are smaller?
www.personaldefenseworld.com/2012/11/baby-glock-26/#glock-26_gen4_details-0630_phatchfinal
As far as the rail goes.
Last edited:
For those who carry babyguns (sub compact)G26 vs 43?
- Thread starter Edwardteach72
- Start date
www.personaldefenseworld.com/2012/11/baby-glock-26/#glock-26_gen4_details-0630_phatchfinal
As far as the rail goes.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
I knew you would post that. I showed it to you. 100 lumens? HAAAAAAAAIt feels the same to me as a 19 recoil wise. Maybe your hands are smaller?
www.personaldefenseworld.com/2012/11/baby-glock-26/#glock-26_gen4_details-0630_phatchfinal
As far as the rail goes.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
It's a carry piece. Why would you want a torch to kill your night vision?
There are many ways to skin a cat unless you really need the rail to attach a Peq 15 to it or a bipod or forward grip.
Honestly stock p07 trigger isn't horrible but not the best but again it's a $400 gun.
I dropped $7 for a CGW reduced power trigger return spring and $24 for the defensive spring kit (18# hammer spring and lighter firing pin spring to match it) and a little polishing, the trigger is like night and day. Going to eventually do the whole trigger kit ($224) which I hear makes the DA/SA one of the best on the market. So $400 in the gun $224 in the trigger $624 all together. So like $50 more than a stock glock can't really beat it
Eddie Gunks
.338 Win Mag
The manual safety makes it a single action only. (1911 style) and this improves the trigger dramatically. Like i said, for what it was it was aweome for an out of the box gun.
The da/sa sucked imo. Night and day. Switch yours to sao. You wont be disappointed.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
A jack of all trades would be a carry piece and hd ect.... Why would you want to see what you are shooting at? No rail = fail.
Justincase
6.5 Creedmoor
I love my 43. The difference in width between the two might not seem like much to some, but for my size and body type, there's no way I could conceal the 26. The 43 barely conceals completely on me as it is, but it does. I wasn't even sure that I'd be able to conceal anything around my waist. In addition to that, the grip width vs length of the 26 makes it very unwieldy for me. I can't get enough purchase around the circumference of the grip with my little sausage fingers. With the 43, that's not a problem. Those of you with different builds and hand sizes will likely not have these issues. Wish the 26 worked for me, cuz it's a very sensible choice, but it doesn't. YMMV
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
You can't see what you are shooting at with 100 lumens? You need a fucking torch that lights up a whole room rather just the target?
There was another thread on just that very subject.
I did switch it and No switching doesn't make it SAO like a 1911, it just gives you the ability to carry it cocked and locked, you can still thumb down the hammer and carry it DA/SA, or keep second strike capabilities, 2 things a 1911 can't do
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
@ECU Pirates , you can't see what you are shooting at with 100 lumens? You need a fucking torch that lights up a whole room and kills your night vision rather than just the target?
There was another thread on just that very subject.
As far as Jack of all trades, my 26 serves that purpose just like a snub nosed .38 serve millions of households in the past. I don't understand why people need a super large gun for home defense and the small one for carry because it is a semi auto when in the past they did not for revolvers. Rarely did a person use a snub nose for concealed carry and once they got home, locked it up because it was now useless at home, and transitioned to a long six inch barrel for home defense.
I do agree that they should have put a rail on it just because but it isn't a deal breaker that would make me rethink and purchase something else that isn't compatible with magazines of other models, the abundance of aftermarket parts, and and carbines that take it's magazines.
There was another thread on just that very subject.
As far as Jack of all trades, my 26 serves that purpose just like a snub nosed .38 serve millions of households in the past. I don't understand why people need a super large gun for home defense and the small one for carry because it is a semi auto when in the past they did not for revolvers. Rarely did a person use a snub nose for concealed carry and once they got home, locked it up because it was now useless at home, and transitioned to a long six inch barrel for home defense.
I do agree that they should have put a rail on it just because but it isn't a deal breaker that would make me rethink and purchase something else that isn't compatible with magazines of other models, the abundance of aftermarket parts, and and carbines that take it's magazines.
Last edited:
Justincase
6.5 Creedmoor
They likely didn't put a rail on it on purpose. I'd bet dollars to donuts the next gen has a rail.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I believe you are correct. They did it to make you purchase the next step up in the 19 in the past.
Now they'll probably put it on the Gen 5 so that you can buy that one.
They may have left it off because at the time WML where not as popular as they are now
But it's still a sub 3.5" barrel which you lose some bullet potential, well a lot that's why companies are now trying to develop ammo to reliably work in baby barrels
Eddie Gunks
.338 Win Mag
My example was it acted like a 1911.....cocked and locked.
Mine was real nice. Maybe sometimes i get lucky
Was yours a duty or a gen 2? And from what I have read the stock triggers are hit or miss
Eddie Gunks
.338 Win Mag
Not sure. I got it 3-5 years ago. Not sure. Time flies.
I have been runnjng 1911 since the late 80s. I was totally shocked on how good the plastic gun trigger actually was......but i guess i got lucky.
freddy
.308 Win
G-code makes an appendix holster for the 43 with TLR6, but sadly not the 26 with the TLR6. Might try it on the 43 anyway. I would prefer not saw off the grip of a 19. I hope a future 26 has the rail.It feels the same to me as a 19 recoil wise. Maybe your hands are smaller?
www.personaldefenseworld.com/2012/11/baby-glock-26/#glock-26_gen4_details-0630_phatchfinal
As far as the rail goes.
I love my XDS also. My XDS 4.0 9mm is my go to semi for CCW (and the only semi I own currently). I love mine with the 7 and 8 round mag. When I don't have my XDS or want to carry a BUG I have my new found favorite...SW 442 in .38+p on me.
freddy
.308 Win
Eddie Gunks
.338 Win Mag
Why not juat put a 17 top on a 19 lower? Seems easier....
freddy
.308 Win
I would like a 26 with a rail. Might chop a 19 to 26 to get it.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
Room? What if I'm out on the back 20 and/or want to blind someone? Do you own a TRL-6? I do. It's a pretty lousy light pattern.
freddy
.308 Win
Not even? Blotchy? Hotspot?
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
It's not that bad. I just like to give Will a tough time. I prefer 200 lumens for inside though. It's a nice compact light. Just a bit weaker than I'm used to.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I considered doing that with a Lone Wolf frame since the grip angle is different to see what it feels like but decided against it since the shorter barrel is more comfortable when sitting in a bucket seat of a car. I wear the pistol low.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Actually, I don't. I use a handheld.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
So do I.