FUAC land headed toward requiring backseat seatbelts

[GOYABEAN]

ALBANY – Requiring the use of seatbelts on backset passengers in New York appears to be just around the corner.

The Assembly is expected to vote on it within days and the Senate Transportation Committee approved it Monday.

New York headed toward requiring backseat seatbelts

 

[Bustedknees]

Backseat fines = new tax $$

 

[Jsmegs77]

Weird, I thought they already did.

 

[Deplorable Me]

Seat belt for gubbiner............

 

[Celt]

Of course he is, then it will be helmets, etc... i expect to see a rise in traffic enforcement coming.

I remember some years ago where there was a major ramp up in traffic stops to generate revenue whenvthere was talk of a highering freeze (iirc).

 

[Carlos Hathcock]

Will o be required to wear a cup as well? After all, what to be fully protected while driving. Tip for Andrew....move it over before you blow me.

 

[Podmonkey]

I didn't realize that all this time the seatbelt law didn't apply to rear passengers.

 

[Toecutter]

I think backseat seat belt laws only allpy to kids

 

[Grimscale]

Now you know one of the REAL reasons rear tint was outlawed.

 

[Dr. Evil]

It aggravates me to no end when they make laws for things people should do without being told to do so. Keep your guns stored when not in use, wear your seatbelt, etc.. No shit Sherlock. I don't need a freaking law passed because there are morons who choose not to do certain things. It's like living with your parents your whole life.

 

[Bigfoot]

It aggravates me to no end when they make laws for things people should do without being told to do so. Keep your guns stored when not in use, wear your seatbelt, etc.. No shit Sherlock. I don't need a freaking law passed because there are morons who choose not to do certain things. It's like living with your parents your whole life.

As in,,, "Nanny state"

 

[Shadow2]

Not governments job to keep insurance profits high.

 

[spat]

Not governments job to keep insurance profits high.

The solution would be for insurers to not pay if you were proven to be not wearing your seatbelts.

I don't want to pay (through increased premiums) for other people's stupidity.

I also don't want the government micromanaging my life.

 

[Rondo223]

I will say if I am driving and I have anyone behind me I want their seat belt on. If I hit something the last thing I need is someone flying over the top of my seat.

 

[Acer-m14]

jeeese just a seat belt .. come on FUAC you can do better .. full roll cages and 5 point harness .. but my 01 4x4 identifies as a Model A ..