Happy 1st Amendment Patriots Day

[Grimscale]

I also wonder, why did the election deniers file case after case if all along they were going to refuse to accept any legal decision that went against their preconceived notions of Truth? Why waste everybody's time if they were never going to accept a legal decision that they were wrong?

Because not a single one of those cases were judged on the merits and evidence. Evidence which the public has seen, and have sought to have the power-that-be explain.
Yet, instead of an explanation, all they get is "you are not allowed to question this."
Cover-ups are not the way to "justify" what happened. Open dialog, communication, explanation...those are the way to prove what happened was legit.
Having a bought-and-paid-for judge say "nothing to see here, move along" is not a legal decision. It's a cover-up.
I'm sure you will come back with some BS statement of "there is no evidence" since you've been regurgitating the "official" line all along.
But if you can't even understand why people want to see the truth, rather than propaganda and lies, then I'm sorry for you. I hope you are quite happy in your fantasy land.

 

[Dr. Evil]

But if you can't even understand why people want to see the truth, rather than propaganda and lies, then I'm sorry for you. I hope you are quite happy in your fantasy land.

 

[JonStoh]

Because not a single one of those cases were judged on the merits and evidence. Evidence which the public has seen, and have sought to have the power-that-be explain.....

Wrong. Several of the cases were judges based on the merits of the case. And in the Supreme Court case that was rejected due to lack of standing, the Conservative justices remarked that even if they did rule on the cases, they would have rejected the argument made by Trump's side.

There is only ONE logical and rational argument made by the Trump side. It has nothing to do with Venezuela or China or Dominion software. The only semi legit argument they can make is the based on the Supreme Legislature Theory, that any and all election rules made by the state legislatures are immune from judicial review or emergency adjustment by the Governor. That issue has NOT been settled yet and is currently with the Supreme Court.

Personally I think the logic of that argument is crap. What if election rules made by the Legislature clearly violate the state constitution? What if they clearly violate Federal law against gender, race, religious discrimination? Surely no law should be above judicial review, including election law.

 

[Dr. Evil]

 

[Defilade]

View attachment 186692

Now replace those in jail with the tyrants who felt Due Process doesn't have to be followed.

 

[pshift]

This is all media spinning. Photoshopped pics, and all that. Unless you were there and have your own pics, you cannot trust ANY of the fake narratives being painted.

 

[Steal2B]

 

[Steal2B]

 

[Modean]

Is it just me or have Republicans become the biggest sore-loser crybabies when it comes to losing elections?

Gore took it like a man. So did Kerry.

Trump called for chaos.

Hillary took it like a whiney bitch. She conceded, and then spent the next 2 years moaning about Trump being illegitimate. Please don’t deny it. There is lots of video.

 

[Steal2B]

 

[SonOfSun]

View attachment 189962