I am not in favor of the laws denying funds to sanctuary cities. We don't need any more laws. Just charge the offending officials with aiding and abetting, or interfering with a federal investigation, or something along those lines.
The solution to every problem *isn't* a new law.
Well, they don't need a law like that to prosecute any other federal crime.So you think the arrest of a politician for flouting federal law could be possible without passing a law stating that it is illegal and punishable to disregard federal law regardless of state law?
Even if they walk, they'll be out as much money as they'd lose to this law, and we wouldn't have new laws on the books, *and* everyone involved would think twice.I'm not a proponent of any additional laws either but charging an elected official is fine, prosecuting and convicting one is another matter. Waste of time and money and in the end, they'll walk.
Well, they don't need a law like that to prosecute any other federal crime.
If I knowingly harbor a bank robber, I'm going to federal prison, why are things any different for an illegal ? Or do you think if it's the mayor's house the bank robber is being hidden in he would get a pass ?
Democrats hate Americans.how does this not pass with a 100% yea?
what am i missing?
And the feds *do* arrest people for it, even in states where its legal, when they feel like it.And yet federal law says possession, growing, selling and smoking marijuana is illegal.
And the feds *do* arrest people for it, even in states where its legal, when they feel like it.
I'm sick of hearing that these illegals are having they're constitutional rights violated. They don't have the same rights we do because they're not citizens.
Because the people who favor illegal immigration tend to hate the constitutionThis is the elephant in the room that almost everyone on all sides of the debate is missing, either intentionally or otherwise.
The Constitutional freedoms and protections do not apply to them. The rights codified in the Bill of Rights do not apply to them. The only legitimate way for them to acquire these rights is to become citizens via the naturalization process. Period.
It completely boggles my mind how this point is completely skipped over in any discussion on immigration.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
how does this not pass with a 100% yea?
what am i missing?