Robin
.475 A&M Magnum
All firearms are machines, and guns, therefore machine-guns. Thats the progressive primer for gun confiscation.
Robin
Robin
What is your definition of "continuous pull"?
If you pull the trigger and DO NOT RELEASE it and more than one round fires I would call it a machinegun. That is not the case here.
It's still a rifle based on the definition of a rifle. A rifle can be a machine gun too. A pistol can be a machine gun too.As would I. I personally don't believe a binary trigger meets the definition of a Machine Gun, or a Rifle, or a Firearm or Semiautomatic for that matter. It doesn't matter what I believe though, all that really matters is what a DA might do. Based on PL265, my personal opinion is it wouldn't take a DA a huge leap to try to convince a jury it is a machine gun. "So ladies and gentleman of the jury, with only 5 continuous pulls of the trigger, this rifle completely discharged the maximum capacity of rounds permitted by law..." I'm done arguing, lol...
It's still a rifle based on the definition of a rifle. A rifle can be a machine gun too. A pistol can be a machine gun too.
But you have to release it unless it was held back permanently and then it wouldn't be a binary trigger.What is your definition of "continuous pull"?
If you pull the trigger and DO NOT RELEASE it and more than one round fires I would call it a machinegun. That is not the case here.
I stand corrected.Yeah, but is it?
"Rifle" means a weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and
intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed or redesigned and
made or remade to use the energy of the explosive in a fixed metallic
cartridge to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for
each single pull of the trigger.
That's what we are trying to say.Is pulling the trigger the same as releasing it? That's all you have to know. I don't know why that is so difficult. Are we now saying that a trigger reset is the same as pulling it? Anyway, yes in places like NY and CA where most of the populous is retarded it would be easy to convince them a binary trigger makes a rifle a machine gun.
So were you saying that with a binary trigger it does or doesn't meet the NY definition of a rifle? Because with the current definition it still does.That's what we are trying to say.
So were you saying that with a binary trigger it does or doesn't meet the NY definition of a machine gun? Because with the current definition it still does.
"Rifle" means a weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and
intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed or redesigned and
made or remade to use the energy of the explosive in a fixed metallic
cartridge to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for
each single pull of the trigger.
Yeah I changed it.You mean rifle? Not machine gun?
It doesn't for someone who knows what they are talking about. It does for someone who doesn't know how firearms work. And the judge and jury will NOT know how firearms work and you will not be able to show them how they work. They aren't going to let you fire it to show them. It will all go based on the report from the arresting agency that test fired the weapon.So were you saying that with a binary trigger it does or doesn't meet the NY definition of a machine gun? Because with the current definition it still does.
"Rifle" means a weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and
intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed or redesigned and
made or remade to use the energy of the explosive in a fixed metallic
cartridge to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for
each single pull of the trigger.
I agree. But eh. I don't have to worry about that here at least. For now.It doesn't for someone who knows what they are talking about. It does for someone who doesn't know how firearms work. And the judge and jury will NOT know how firearms work and you will not be able to show them how they work. They aren't going to let you fire it to show them. It will all go based on the report from the arresting agency that test fired the weapon.
The problem is the definition falls apart on the second pull. That's all an attorney has to tell the jury. "Look I pulled the trigger twice and 3 (or 4 bullets) were discharged, when the law requires that only 2 bullets will be discharged from each single pull of the trigger pulled twice." It's ambiguous at best. As is most of the unSAFE act...
Not for civilian sales in CA, DC, IA, NJ, NY, or WA
Suggest if you really want one you should convince Franklin Armory to ship one to you.