Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
This man makes a lot of sense. A very good listen.
Last edited:
More pressing question would be... is this before or after the "black swan" event?
Did you even listen all the way through? I'm still listening and I'm the one that posted it lol.More bla bla bla.
Think I'll make some rye bread today.
Not for the dems. They stole one, openly, and got away with it. Think they will just abandon a successful tactic?May is far too late in a Presidential election year
Did you even listen all the way through? I'm still listening and I'm the one that posted it lol.
Some things are done justice by listening to them from start to finish to see how the information is weaved together compared to skipping around. This video is one such example IMHO.Nope, but I did skip/jump thru it.... boring. Besides, Joe won't be out until someone (mayhapse Dr. Jill??) pulls the plug
He dont have to step down, he can just fall up the stairs and they wont pick him up and say he died. They "put" Brandon in office and they will "put" anyone else in his place the same way. No one is "worse" than Brandon, he cant even pretend he knows what goes on around him, he turns to shake hands with no there on stage in public. He called for someone to stand and be recognized who was the dead person the memorial was for that he was speaking at. And how many other embarrassing stunts in public has he performed. They dont care what we see, they are happy he is an embarrassment in the eyes of the world. Whoever "they" are, they are running the country and "they" are not Americans. We have already lost.Biden won’t step down. Who else do they have Newsome? He’s worse than Biden and spent more money than anyone else.
Some things are done justice by listening to them from start to finish to see how the information is weaved together compared to skipping around. This video is one such example IMHO.
I hear you. I wasn't familiar with him either but he sounds like one of us as far as not liking libs and he brings up some very valid points as well as logical information.Well shit.... ok, maybe I'll give it a go from start to finish... maybe. I do like to be/stay informed. Thing is though, I've never heard of Jim Rickards so as far as I know he's just another "expert", another talking head voicing an opinion. And I know you know what they say about opinions
I hear you. I wasn't familiar with him either but he sounds like one of us as far as not liking libs and he brings up some very valid points as well as logical information.
Well shit.... ok, maybe I'll give it a go from start to finish... maybe. I do like to be/stay informed. Thing is though, I've never heard of Jim Rickards so as far as I know he's just another "expert", another talking head voicing an opinion. And I know you know what they say about opinions
IMO, Biden will lie his way through the SOTU and be stepping down by end of February for the good of the party & country and to deflect impeachment, think Nixon. Kamaltoe will get double asterisks for 1st black female POTUS but not the Dem nomination for election and will have to participate in the primaries. We know how well that worked for her last time. Winner of the primary will depend on who gets the support of BLM, Antifa Democrat types. have been saying this for awhileBiden won’t step down. Who else do they have Newsome? He’s worse than Biden and spent more money than anyone else.
Ive listened to him talk for years, My boy's wicket schmat
James G. Rickards is a lawyer and investment banker with over 30 years experience working in capital markets. Rickards advises the Department of Defense and the U.S. Intelligence community on global finance, and served as the facilitator of the first ever financial war games conducted by the Pentagon. He is a frequent guest on CNBC, CNN, Bloomberg TV, NPR, and lectures at Northwestern University and at the School of Advanced International Studies.
Rickards is currently senior managing director for market intelligence at Omnis, Inc., a consulting firm.
In 1981, Rickards was involved in the Iran hostage crisis and as former general counsel for the hedge fund, Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), he was the principal negotiator in the 1998 bailout of LTCM by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
An advocate of returning to the gold standard, Rickards has written for periodicals such as the Financial Times, The New York Times, and The Washington Post on topics such as the emerging field of "threat finance," national security, and geopolitics.
James G. Rickards (29 September 1951) is an American lawyer, investment banker, media commentator, and author on matters of finance and precious metals.[1] He is the author of Currency Wars: The Making of the Next Global Crisis (2011) and six other books. He currently lives in Connecticut.
Biography[edit]
Rickards graduated from Lower Cape May Regional High School in Cape May, New Jersey, in 1969.[2] He graduated from Johns Hopkins University in 1973 with a Bachelor of Arts degree with honors, and in 1974, from the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, D.C., with an M.A. in international economics. He received his Juris Doctor from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and an Master of Laws in taxation from New York University School of Law.[3]
He has held senior positions at Citibank, Long-Term Capital Management, and Caxton Associates.[4] As general counsel for the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM),[5] he successfully negotiated the $3.6 billion rescue of the firm via the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1998.[6] Rickards worked on Wall Street for 35 years.[7] Later, Rickards became the senior managing director at Tangent Capital Partners LLC, a merchant bank based in New York City,[8] and also the senior managing director for market intelligence at Omnis, Inc.,[9] a technical, professional and scientific consulting firm in McLean, Va.[3] On March 24, 2009, Rickards presented his view at a symposium at Johns Hopkins University, that the U.S. dollar was facing imminent hyperinflation and was vulnerable to attack from foreign governments through the accumulation of gold and the establishment of a new global currency.[10]
On September 10, 2009, Rickards testified before the U.S. House Science Subcommittee on Oversight about the risks of financial modeling, value at risk, and the 2008 financial crisis.[11]
He has also claimed he advised the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. intelligence community, and major hedge funds on global financial issues, and has served as a facilitator of the first ever financial war games conducted by The Pentagon. He also guest-lectures at The Kellogg School at Northwestern University and the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University.[8] He states he was on the Advisory Board of the Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance, a former organization within the right-wing think tank and lobbying organization, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) in Washington, D.C.[4]
Publications[edit]
Rickards's first book, Currency Wars: The Making of the Next Global Crisis, was published in 2011. In it, he argued that currency wars are not just an economic or monetary concern but a national security concern. He maintained that the United States faced serious threats to its national security,[12] from clandestine gold purchases by China to the hidden agendas of sovereign wealth funds, and that greater than any single threat was the very real danger of the collapse of the dollar itself. Rickards charged that the Federal Reserve was involved in what he called "the greatest gamble in the history of finance." The Fed's easing of financial conditions through lowering long-term interest rates was, he wrote, "essentially a program of printing money to spur growth."
It didn't take 31 minutes for his prediction. It took 31 minutes to set up and explain the logic for his prediction. I would rather know why so I can determine if I buy his prediction. The why was the 31 minutes. Holy shit, tough crowd.why does it take 31 mins to say your prediction Jim ??
Stop babbling
It didn't take 31 minutes for his prediction. It took 31 minutes to set up and explain the logic for his prediction. I would rather know why so I can determine if I buy his prediction. The why was the 31 minutes. Holy shit, tough crowd.