SmallGameAddict
.308 Win
Just heard on FM radio, Justice Kennedy is considering retiring this summer.
I was thinking that, but didn't say it out loud haha.Good. Then when RBG dies we will have three.
I'm sure that was Ginsberg., She is well into her 80'sPretty sure Chucky Schumer just peed his pants.
She died 10 years ago, she just forgot to lay down.Good. Then when RBG dies we will have three.
What "aw" and magazine ban cases are left?Take "Notorious RBG" with you. Then we can move to kill unSAFE.
What "aw" and magazine ban cases are left?
Who cares. There isn't a dime worth of difference between any of the justices. They just play roles and if needed switch place to pretend there is ideological arm wrestling going on. The problem is not so much that our system is corrupt, it's the people who refuse to see it.
MAAAAAAN.Who cares. There isn't a dime worth of difference between any of the justices. They just play roles and if needed switch place to pretend there is ideological arm wrestling going on. The problem is not so much that our system is corrupt, it's the people who refuse to see it.
If you truly believe this, then you’ve never read decisions from appellate courts, the districts, or the scotus.
This couldn’t be further from the truth. You may not always agree with their decisions, but it’s nonsensical to think that Roberts is the same as Sotomayor (for example).
Now that I disagree with. In the last decade, SCOTUS ruled that 2A was an individual right, applicable to the states through the 14th Amendment, and that laws banning handguns are unconstitutional.If one more is appointed, if one more kicks the bucket. The same old excuses for decades. At some point one needs to wake up and smell the coffee.
Now that I disagree with. In the last decade, SCOTUS ruled that 2A was an individual right, applicable to the states through the 14th Amendment, and that laws banning handguns are unconstitutional.
Welp, I waited almost 50 long years to hear SCOTUS finally rule that 2A was an individual right, and that laws banning handguns and the legal carry thereof was unconstitutional. Rome wasn't built in a day. I'll be dead in 20 years if I'm lucky. If you think it's realistic that they will take up every 2A case that is appealed from the US Court of Appeals, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you. In the meantime, we'll have to wait.It's corrupt no matter what. We have a majority now not that it matters since it shouldn't be that way to rule on the Constitution and still gun cases get ignored. The same would happen if the numbers tip 3 more to our favor.
Anyone who actually believes these so called conservative judges have our backs on the 2A is blind.
I mean look at the shitty, trojan horse of a ruling we got with Heller.
Okay, but then why did they kill Scalia?Federal courts use Heller decision to uphold gun control. It was a Trojan horse.
Okay, but then why did they kill Scalia?
Or pillow over the face. With no autopsy.Scalia was a poster boy for heart attack.
What ive been hearing is that Kenbedy retiring this summer will be good for the Repubs in the midterms.It would be awesome to be able to have Trump fill 2 more seats on the court. Just gotta hope that we don't have trouble in the midterms, but the outlook is good right now.
That in itself is the definition of corruption. Why did it take 50 years? Why did they interpret the 2A and say it has limits? Why won't they take just one and rule so that no other cases need to be ruled on?Welp, I waited almost 50 long years to hear SCOTUS finally rule that 2A was an individual right, and that laws banning handguns and the legal carry thereof was unconstitutional. Rome wasn't built in a day. I'll be dead in 20 years if I'm lucky. If you think it's realistic that they will take up every 2A case that is appealed from the US Court of Appeals, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you. In the meantime, we'll have to wait.
Good question. Get on the phone and find out.That in itself is the definition of corruption. Why did it take 50 years? Why did they interpret the 2A and say it has limits? Why won't they take just one and rule so that no other cases need to be ruled on?