Men fucking rule !!! …. Wait
Easy for me since I don't drink.I put that list up, and it is a very short one as there are many more companies that have shown support for the LGBTQ community, to illustrate the absurdity of people getting upset over 1 Bud Lite can. Absolut, Smirnoff, Jack Daniels, Jim Beam, Buffalo Trace, Bulleit, Coors, Sam Adams, Corona and many more distilleries and breweries have done the same thing.
I had a couple regulars come in the bar where I tend last night. They have been Bud Light drinkers since I have known them. They both swear they will never drink a Budweiser product again. They ordered Mich Ultra. I thought about telling them who brews Mich Ultra but said screw it.
BTW, I would appreciate if you refer to me by my pronoun instead of "guys."Guys, it is one can that was sent to Dylan Mulvaney with his picture on it.
Must be a drunk in charge! .im hearing they have lost 5 billion so far ..
View attachment 197267
"Since March 31, shares of Bud Light’s parent company have fallen by nearly 4% — knocking down the company’s market capitalization from $132.38 billion to $127.13 billion on Wednesday.
Anheuser-Busch stock fizzled more than 1.5% on Wednesday."
Anheuser-Busch loses more than $5 billion in value amid Dylan Mulvaney Bud Light controversy
Anheuser-Busch stock was down more than 1.5% on Wednesday.nypost.com
Maybe I’m missing something here, but are we really comparing trans and gay people to nazis? That seems a tad dramatic.Doesn't matter if it was just photoshopped onto a can for the marketing.
It's not about the cans, it's about the statement.
If they photoshopped a swastika on a can and sent a pic to the leader of the Aryan nation, would be be no big deal because it was only one can ?
Not all trans people, just the militant zealots.Maybe I’m missing something here, but are we really comparing trans and gay people to nazis? That seems a tad dramatic.
Nobody is claiming they don't have a *right* to do this. But everyone pretty much universally acknowledges that it was a very bad idea.Bud Light can and is spending their marketing dollars how they want, that’s their choice, just like you have a choice in what beers you purchase. All this controversy does is give them free PR.
I’ll respectfully disagree with you as far as trans people being “more dangerous than the modern neo-nazis”, I was raised that a nazi is a nazi & I just don’t see how anybody who wants to be the opposite gender is harmful, but I’m a live and let live kind of guy i guessNot all trans people, just the militant zealots.
And yes, they are *far more* dangerous than the modern neo-nazis, primarily because many people take them seriously.
Nobody is claiming they don't have a *right* to do this. But everyone pretty much universally acknowledges that it was a very bad idea.
It's not exactly "free PR", so far it's cost them about $6B in market cap and 50% of their sales...
I understand where you’re coming from, and I think we’d both agree that we both just want what is safest for all of us, and our families.so your ok with a man sharing the bathroom / shower room ...
with your female wife or female daughter at the school locker room ..
if you have either ..
so your ok with a man sharing the bathroom / shower room ...
with your female wife or female daughter at the school locker room ..
if you have either ..
View attachment 197841
Someone who just wants to live their life differently is not objectionable. Dress how you want, we don't care.I’ll respectfully disagree with you as far as trans people being “more dangerous than the modern neo-nazis”, I was raised that a nazi is a nazi & I just don’t see how anybody who wants to be the opposite gender is harmful, but I’m a live and let live kind of guy i guess
sure does look like bud lite is taking a hit though, oh well!
fwiw, I’m totally with you on how dangerous the furries are ( although thankfully, I don’t see any of that happening soon, those freaks are really TOO out there, even for most libs).Someone who just wants to live their life differently is not objectionable. Dress how you want, we don't care.
The "bake me a cake or else" crowd OTOH are very dangerous.
The "use my pronouns or I'll get you fired" crows are repugnant.
The people who think anyone who doesn't accept their personal kink deserves a *violent* response are a menace to society.
The man who wants to play a contact sport in the girls league *is very dangerous* to the girls in that league.
You know what the next step past the transgenders is ? It's the furrys. Nobody cares if an adult wants to put on a cat costume and attend an organization, but imagine if they started insisting they *were* cats and dogs, and suddenly they had the backing of the government and media in that delusion. If they insisted you were a bigot if you objected to them using a litter box in their cube at work.
Imagine if the flat earthers got that level of power and demanded acceptance, if engineers or navigators had to pretend to accept "their truth" or risk their jobs. It's that dangerous.
You may have personal reasons to have strong sympathy with the transgenders, and the vast majority of them are harmless, but the movement itself has become militant and quite dangerous.
The neo-nazis ? They're a joke, no matter how repugnant their beliefs, they simply aren't powerful enough to be worthy of fear. Nobody takes them seriously, there's barely a handful of them in existence, and probably half of *them* are on the FBI payroll.
The militant wing of the transgender movement is demanding *medical science* be rewritten to conform to their delusion. You can take whatever social role you want, but that doesn't mean Burt now has a period just because he started calling himself Beth, and demanding eveeyone else to take that seriously, let alone doctors is fundamentally dangerous.
They aren't. Only the narcissists are, who happen to be the loudest and most visible, and happen to be running the show.I don’t think all trans people should automatically be considered dangerous.