MA teen sent home for wearing shirt that says there are only two genders

John Stark

John Stark

.44 mag
Messages
939
Reaction score
2,745
Location
IAM
www.breitbart.com

Federal Court Rules Against Student Who Wore 'Only Two Genders' Shirt

The First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against a middle school student who wore a T-shirt with the message, "There are only two genders."
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

You know who likes to shut people up from telling the truth?

Government, and cults.

And there isn't much difference between the two at this point.
 
Last edited:
Apeman

Apeman

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
1,830
Reaction score
3,935
Location
Saratoga
Whats up with all this "I don't feel safe" bullshit? Because of a fucking shirt? It'd be different if he was threatening others bit it's printed words. If you don't like it walk away. Can we start suing NY for progressive billboards we don't agree with along the highway?

Like Bigfoot said - he's not wrong. Even the medical community agrees because when you go to the hospital to mutilate yourself your options are male or female.
 
J

JRtraderny

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,342
Reaction score
1,421
Location
USA
SonOfSun

SonOfSun

.308 Win
Messages
4,839
Reaction score
5,978
Location
WNY
Carlos Hathcock said:
Funny. THEY are entitled to THEIR opinion but HE is not entitled to his.
Click to expand...

His shirt is objective fact and reality, it's not even an opinion.

As far as humans are concerned, outside of very rare genetic abnormalities there are only males and females - and that's it. You can't switch from male to female or vice-versa, you being a male or female is defined by your genetic composition. When we teach things we teach the normal, not the edge case abnormalities. IE. Are there people born with 4 or 6 digits on their hand? Yes. Is it normal? No. We teach that humans have 5 digits (a thumb and 4 fingers) because it's what is the norm for the vast supermajority of the population.
 
Bigfoot

Bigfoot

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
17,747
Reaction score
46,226
Location
On the Trump Train
GOPerfect said:
If they continue, the family will win. There is precedent on this: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
Click to expand...

I had to look that up that... Interesting.


Decision and Reasoning

In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court’s majority ruled that neither students nor teachers “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” The Court took the position that school officials could not prohibit only on the suspicion that the speech might disrupt the learning environment.

The dissent argued that the First Amendment does not grant the right to express any opinion at any time. Students attend school to learn, not teach. The armbands were a distraction. School officials, acting on a legitimate interest in school order, should have broad authority to maintain a productive learning environment.

Facts and Case Summary - Tinker v. Des Moines

Decision Date: February 24, 1969 Background At a public school in Des Moines, Iowa, students planned to wear black armbands at school as a silent protest against the Vietnam War. When the principal became aware of the plan, he warned the students that they would be suspended if they wore the...
www.uscourts.gov www.uscourts.gov
 
spat

spat

.950 JDJ
Messages
30,093
Reaction score
63,517
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top