GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ

But there isn't a law against pistol braces.But there are....................
Just like the CRS case locked up over a novelty gag and bureaucrats twisting none exciting law's!But there isn't a law against pistol braces.
The ATF just decided in their own one day to make one. Despite them not being part of the legislative branch.
And their excuse is that the law passed by congress is ambiguous about braces, so they can do what they want.
I *really* want to see someone make the argument that "if the ATF says the law isn't clear, then the whole section of law is unconstitutional for vagueness".
Sorry.... I need to preface this apology....
Does anyone really think a pistol brace rule/law is on the radar of the President and the AG?
You think they give 2 shits over this shit?
For real? All the issues the US of A has and this is what people want tackled?
As for these charges.........
The indictment is YEARS old....
View attachment 263435
No matter his deep you dig into it, the mine is still boggled.Why an Unelected agency like the ATF has any say in anything is mine boggling. What's next? McDonald's can rule and have people locked up for taking more than 3 Napkins?
technically you don't want her to throw it out.The fact that Bondi hasn't thrown it out is a bad sign though.
A rule interpretation by the aft is not the same as a law, even if they treat it that way.But there are....................
The fact that Bondi hasn't thrown it out is a bad sign though.
But there isn't a law against pistol braces.
The ATF just decided in their own one day to make one. Despite them not being part of the legislative branch.
And their excuse is that the law passed by congress is ambiguous about braces, so they can do what they want.
I *really* want to see someone make the argument that "if the ATF says the law isn't clear, then the whole section of law is unconstitutional for vagueness".