Mom with 'gut feeling' stops school shooter before planned attack

[Madmallard]

A suspicious mom who followed her instincts helped prevent a mass school shooting.

On Wednesday, Koeberle Bull of Lumberton, N.J., woke up to a racist message on Facebook from a man in Kentucky. “It was really vulgar — he called my kids the N-word and hoped terrible things for them,” Bull tells Yahoo Lifestyle.

The mom of three biracial children, ages 16, 11, and 8, was especially concerned about the man’s profile picture in which he showed off a gun, so, going on a “gut feeling,” she called her local police station and filed a report. “But I felt like it wouldn’t really go anywhere, so I posted a screenshot of the message on Facebook,” she says.

Mom with 'gut feeling' stops school shooter before planned attack

 

[Airborneguy]

Sounds like a 2nd Amendment violation to me. After he conducted the shooting, then the cops could arrest him.

 

[soylentBlue]

She just ruined the Left's next talking point going into the midterms.

 

[gun_slinger_boy]

"Local and state police followed the mom’s tip, and on Thursday, officers drove to the home of a 20-year-old man named Dylan Jarrell, just as he was leaving his house with more than 200 rounds of ammunition, a bulletproof vest, a firearm, a 100-round high-capacity magazine, and a “detailed plan of attack.”"



Does that mean he was going to meet up with others or something? Maybe he planned to whip out the plan and read it periodically during the attack?

 

[HighlandLofts]

She didn't do diddly squat, remember it's all TRUMPS FAULT.

 

[SomeSoldier]

"Jarrell was charged with one count of harassing communications and is being held in the Shelby County Detention Center."

Need to read KY law to see what this charge means but sounds like limited speech to me. 1A violation?

 

[Airborneguy]

The 1st Amendment doesn't give one the right to harass other people. From the article, his facebook messages could have possibly been aggravated harassment here in NY, otherwise definitely harassment.

 

[Airborneguy]

Regardless, how could anyone question this case? Thank god for this woman and the cop in KY who took her seriously. Hopefully this kid rots in prison for a long time.

 

[SomeSoldier]

The 1st Amendment doesn't give one the right to harass other people. From the article, his facebook messages could have possibly been aggravated harassment here in NY, otherwise definitely harassment.

Let me start with harassment is not ok.

I am think more along the lines of she didn't like what he had to say so harassment. But like I said I would need to read what the laws are. Also was it a direct message or was it a public post?

 

[Marine Cpl]

Sounds like a 2nd Amendment violation to me. After he conducted the shooting, then the cops could arrest him.

Correct. But in this case there was evidence on his plans.

 

[Marine Cpl]

The 1A gives me the right to say whatever I want. I can call you a π^&&£® in person but the crime is disorderly conduct if I'm creating a scene or a harrasment charge if I'm following you around. Online it's a crime if I threaten you.

Those crimes can be investigated. But the words themselves are protected free speech.

 

[Airborneguy]

Let me start with harassment is not ok.

I am think more along the lines of she didn't like what he had to say so harassment. But like I said I would need to read what the laws are. Also was it a direct message or was it a public post?

I believe the article said she woke up to messages. I know what you're thinking - that he said something about the make up of her family and got arrested for it - but the article says he wished them harm. The wording of that is what would change it from harassment (causing annoyance or alarm) to aggravated harassment (causing fear), here at least.

 

[SomeSoldier]

The 1A gives me the right to say whatever I want. I can call you a π^&&£® in person but the crime is disorderly conduct if I'm creating a scene or a harrasment charge if I'm following you around. Online it's a crime if I threaten you.

Those crimes can be investigated. But the words themselves are protected free speech.

I agree that is why I pointed to "1 count harassing communications", and why I said was it a public post or private message.

 

[Grimscale]

Police also revealed that in May, Jarrell had been questioned by the FBI regarding social media threats toward a Tennessee school.

So I'm the only one to wonder at the outcome of the above questioning?

This guy obviously had a history. How'd the FBI drop the ball so bad (again)?

 

[Shadow2]

Why the F do you have an open Facebook account to begin with .. Why people choose to expose their families to the world to begin with escapes me ... People have no brains ..

 

[gun_slinger_boy]

Why the F do you have an open Facebook account to begin with .. Why people choose to expose their families to the world to begin with escapes me ... People have no brains ..

This is the "look at me" generation. The youth of today has an insatiable appetite for attention.

 

[Acer-m14]

i wake up every day to harassing shit on the net from Mad Max , Polosie , FUAC .. Ect .. who should i call to have them arrested ??