Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
hurray hurray gun rights for some but not for you (others) ....
take this bill and shove it .. u know where ..
National Reciprocity introduced in senate
- Thread starter Celt
- Start date
hurray hurray gun rights for some but not for you (others) ....
take this bill and shove it .. u know where ..
Right, it doesn't make sense, but that's how the bill reads apparently.
But, I guess you get some perks for living in a state with better gun laws.
Celt
.450/400 Nitro Ex
EXCLUSIVE: National Reciprocity Has Bipartisan Support in the House
Breitbart News discussed national reciprocity with Rep. Richard Hudson and he told us that his bill has bipartisan support.
www.breitbart.com
Well...
It is always and constantly befuddling, how the ONE Right written with explicit instructions, is consistently ignored!!!
"Shall Not Be Infringed"
Pretty clear, right? What could be confusing in those words? How could it be confusing? How can it then be ignored with some of the worst infringements you could ever impose, like in NY, which by ruling, has defacto restricted citizens Rights of Exercising their 2A Rights by State Malfeasance! Acts and actions with no other purpose than to add encumbrances and impediments to it's resident citizens enjoining their 2A Rights!
It may fall to the States, but Federal Law Rules and sets the bar, no? How in this example are States allowed to set "Lower" bars by infringement of that Right? Meaning if the Federal Govt has no law for "Training" how can a State then introduce it! Hmmmmm...
I know, reverse logic!
It CAN succeed!!! And SHOULD! If for any other reason, just to cause a mass psychosis on the Liberal brained koolaid drinkers that'll vomit for weeks and not leave their homes! Etc!
Call your elected representative and demand their position on it (Bill)! Let them know they'll be outted if they don't support it! Thank you very much!
The TIME is now, not like Trump's first term that wasted 2 years and accomplished nothing by all the entrenched swampers fighting over bits and pieces! The Super Majority DEMANDS a reset, and reshaping of the fabric of the Nation!
Let it be by reinforcing the Originalist Ideologies of our Founders!
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
You bet your fucking ass, that's exactly what they meant!
It is always and constantly befuddling, how the ONE Right written with explicit instructions, is consistently ignored!!!
"Shall Not Be Infringed"
Pretty clear, right? What could be confusing in those words? How could it be confusing? How can it then be ignored with some of the worst infringements you could ever impose, like in NY, which by ruling, has defacto restricted citizens Rights of Exercising their 2A Rights by State Malfeasance! Acts and actions with no other purpose than to add encumbrances and impediments to it's resident citizens enjoining their 2A Rights!
It may fall to the States, but Federal Law Rules and sets the bar, no? How in this example are States allowed to set "Lower" bars by infringement of that Right? Meaning if the Federal Govt has no law for "Training" how can a State then introduce it! Hmmmmm...
I know, reverse logic!
It CAN succeed!!! And SHOULD! If for any other reason, just to cause a mass psychosis on the Liberal brained koolaid drinkers that'll vomit for weeks and not leave their homes! Etc!
Call your elected representative and demand their position on it (Bill)! Let them know they'll be outted if they don't support it! Thank you very much!
The TIME is now, not like Trump's first term that wasted 2 years and accomplished nothing by all the entrenched swampers fighting over bits and pieces! The Super Majority DEMANDS a reset, and reshaping of the fabric of the Nation!
Let it be by reinforcing the Originalist Ideologies of our Founders!
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
You bet your fucking ass, that's exactly what they meant!
Jmac00
.475 A&M Magnum
Celt
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Boy, would this be nice.
www.breitbart.com
We do have the best chances right outta the gate. Lets hope these bills get the attention they deserve!
GOP Rep. Pushes Bill Prohibiting State Bans on Certain Rifles, Shotguns
Rep. Claudia Tenney introduced legislation that would prevent states from banning rifles or shotguns that are legal federally.
www.breitbart.com
We do have the best chances right outta the gate. Lets hope these bills get the attention they deserve!
libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
And on a Tuesday.
ManualF150
.308 Win
I'm hoping Trump will do something about CA/NY firearms/ammo issues. But as we all know, it goes no where.
IrishMick
.44 mag
I don't like that they are passing a bill regarding our right to bear arms, even one that favors the 2A. Any bill passed into law can be repealed as well, or burdened by some federal statutes passed at a later date. What I would like to see is the SCOTUS gird their fucking loins and take on these infringements in a sweeping way. I wish they would stop taking cases that concern illegal alien, left handed, LGTBQ, felons have a right to a muzzle loader and go all in on things that will unequivocally restore the rights to the masses. Besides we have a law regarding the rights of the people.....Shall not be infringed! Incidentally, A Congressional committee did a study a few decades back regarding the 2A (which has been fairly well buried) and the conclusion was that the 2A means exactly what it says.
Regardless of your take on abortion, the Roe v. Wade overturn decision shows me that even an unequivocal SCOTUS decision can be overturned. so any pro-2A ruling can be thrown out as soon as the tyrants regain control and stack the Court.
We need ARRESTS of those who infringe the Constitution!
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
This one has potential IMO.Boy, would this be nice.
GOP Rep. Pushes Bill Prohibiting State Bans on Certain Rifles, Shotguns
Rep. Claudia Tenney introduced legislation that would prevent states from banning rifles or shotguns that are legal federally.
We do have the best chances right outta the gate. Lets hope these bills get the attention they deserve!
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
I agree. I’m not a fan of abortion at all but it was a stupid decision and thing to do. I agree RvW was a stupid decision but this simply inflamed the liberals and it solved nothing. It will be a problem and harm our agenda for years. I do have to say I hope Trump gets to appoint another scotus judge during this term.
Arrests are great but some of these morons will wear them like a badge of honor. We need personal liability and financial penalties for those that restrict our rights and those that do so willfully need punitive damages with a 10-15x multiplier of what the jury awarded.
IrishMick
.44 mag
I agree that the SCOTUS can overturn a previous decision, however, much less likely than Congress repealing a law, or stacking contradictory law on top of the original law. I don't trust either branch of government with my rights. At least the court isn't actively trying to crush my liberty as opposed to the politicians. I just would like to see them take a 2A case that encompasses a wide range of the citizenry and put out a decision that is clear about it. The problem is that the courts rulings seem to have no teeth, look at Bruen decision, it left too many avenues for infringement because it leaves to much unsaid. All the way back to the Miller decision where it allows that a SBS isn't protected because it has no use in militia service but falls short of actually saying that arms useful to militia service are protected which would have removed fully automatic arms from the NFA as they are undeniably useful to militia related activities. By not being more explicit we have wound up with the '94 AWB and the SAFE act. Same with Bruen. Too many unanswered questions have allowed the CCIA. The tyrannical state governments have looked at the ruling and said "If it doesn't say we can't, then we will". The other problem is that the SCOTUS decisions have no teeth. If a state wants to infringe right up to the black letter of the law even when they know that it won't survive higher judicial scrutiny they do, knowing that they will have that law in place for decades before it ever gets to court and is struck down. There needs to be quicker review of shit like the CCIA and a resounding smackdown of these infringements. There also needs to be consequences for politicians who attempt to circumvent these rulings. If they have concocted a law that flies in the face of a ruling, all sponsors and co-sponsors are personally liable for all costs incurred and removed from office. But SCOTUS needs to start by being crystal clear in their rulings (even though we think Bruen was pretty clear, there are gaps that you could drive a truck through). The system is broken.