Ninth Circuit Unanimously Upholds Second Amendment Foundation Victory Over California’s Unconstitutional “One-Gun‑Per‑Month” Rationing Law

[livingston]

Ninth Circuit Unanimously Upholds Second Amendment Foundation Victory Over California’s Unconstitutional “One-Gun‑Per‑Month” Rationing Law​

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a resounding victory for individual rights, unanimously reaffirming a lower court’s judgment that California’s “one‑gun‑per‑month” law is firmly unconstitutional.
The case—Nguyen v. Bonta—was brought by a coalition of individual plaintiffs and pro-Second Amendment organizations, including the Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation.
The plaintiffs challenged California’s draconian law, which prohibits law-abiding citizens from purchasing more than one firearm within any 30-day period, according to Breitbart.
The plaintiffs challenged California’s draconian law, which prohibits law-abiding citizens from purchasing more than one firearm within any 30-day period, according to Breitbart.

Ninth Circuit Unanimously Upholds Second Amendment Foundation Victory Over California’s Unconstitutional “One-Gun‑Per‑Month” Rationing Law | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

In a unanimous decision, the U.S.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[JunkBoxFull]

Wait, did i read that right? The 9th circus gave the people a win? Well if they did, don`t worry, they`ll dream up some other bullshit that they`ll have to spend a gazillion dollars on fighting it.

 

[FP1201]

Now the twist to this would be the application of the Ruling against the proposed "Ten Day Waiting Period for Firearms Purchases" (remember kids, they re-wrote the Laws to include ALL guns as Firearms) ironically the First iteration of the Bill called for a "Three Day Wait" (of course those are Government Business Days)
I figured they changed it to ten days so they could reduce the number as a bargaining chip, calling it a win and then bumping it up after the next engineered crisis committed with a Gun.

Some people are only alive because killing them is illegal. This quote by E. W. Howe suggests that there are individuals who deserve severe consequences, such as death, but are spared due to legal constraints.

 

[Grimscale]

Wait, did i read that right? The 9th circus gave the people a win? Well if they did, don`t worry, they`ll dream up some other bullshit that they`ll have to spend a gazillion dollars on fighting it.

With all the other gun restrictions in CA the 9th circus probably thought it was safe enough to allow this little victory to gun owners as a means of pacifying them.

 

[JunkBoxFull]

With all the other gun restrictions in CA the 9th circus probably thought it was safe enough to allow this little victory to gun owners as a means of pacifying them.

Even pelosi told us that their government would throw us some crumbs once in awhile. She didn`t lie about that.