livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2018/Bills/A1000/655_I1.PDF
Read #20 and 21 in the statement .
Read #20 and 21 in the statement .
Do you have to have special permission or something to carry in NJ? There are plenty of 5 shot 38s and 357 revolvers though.Well that would be a problem for me. I carry in NJ all the time. Couldn’t even carry a revolver if that’s the case.
Well that would be a problem for me. I carry in NJ all the time. Couldn’t even carry a revolver if that’s the case.
This bill would reduce the maximum capacity of a legal 20 ammunition magazine in New Jersey to five rounds.
It's my understanding that the judge(s) said that loading 7 in a 10 round magazine was unconstitutional, not that 7 round magazines were bad. The 7 round magazine was increased back to 10 rounds when Cuomo/legislature basically saw that it would outlaw almost all handguns which wasn't their intended effect.Hahahahaha. Well if they take it to court and court rules in favor of 5 round. Could be a challenge because 7 was considered arbitrary.
Hahahahaha. Well if they take it to court and court rules in favor of 5 round. Could be a challenge because 7 was considered arbitrary.
Do you have to have special permission or something to carry in NJ? There are plenty of 5 shot 38s and 357 revolvers though.
It's my understanding that the judge(s) said that loading 7 in a 10 round magazine was unconstitutional, not that 7 round magazines were bad. The 7 round magazine was increased back to 10 rounds when Cuomo/legislature basically saw that it would outlaw almost all handguns which wasn't their intended effect.
anyone with half a brain knows that restricting round count does not actually limit the number of rounds a criminal will use in a gun, so it only restricts the good guys. they pawn it off as if they are trying to restrict access to criminals by forcing good guys to go without "for the greater good" but they know damn well its just one step closer to single shots, then nothing.
eventually, either scotus has to step up to the plate and put an end to this or we need to "storm the castle" so to speak.
Some might prefer tar, feather, ignition........................i wish people still had the balls to tar and feather these thieving politicians. they steal our rights without any repercussions. its insane to me that people allow this to happen. we almost made the leap to the next level in 2013 with the unsafe. we had numbers, we had motivation but we stopped short unfortunately.
Some might prefer tar, feather, ignition........................
The only check against the judicial branch is impeachment, unfortunately our government is so far gone right now that no one would ever dare impeach a member of the Supreme Court.You are wasting your time trying to inject legal arguments. U.S. Supreme Court does whatever it wants and they only use Constitution to find straws they can grasp to support unconstitutional decisions. There is no oversight to this institution. It is political and corrupt. Neither political party is interested in resolving 2nd amendment issue. This is why the court either refuses to hear 2nd amendment cases or renders Trojan horse decisions, like Heller.
Corruption in all 3 branches has been the norm. I truly believe for the first time in many decades the executive branch isn't corrupt.The only check against the judicial branch is impeachment, unfortunately our government is so far gone right now that no one would ever dare impeach a member of the Supreme Court.
Ill say potus isnt corrupt and some of his staff, but thats,about as far as i can go. I have no faith in any others..Corruption in all 3 branches has been the norm. I truly believe for the first time in many decades the executive branch isn't corrupt.