NY Dem Who Voted For Law Meant to Ensnare President Trump Now Says Law is Unconstitutional After Rape Suit Against Him

[livingston]

NY Dem Who Voted For Law Meant to Ensnare President Trump Now Says Law is Unconstitutional After Rape Suit Against Him​

When Democrat politicians in New York passed the Adult Survivors Act to punish Donald Trump and provide the ability for E. Jean Carroll to go after Trump 30 years later, their Trump Derangement Syndrome blinded them to how it might impact them.

The now-expired act allowed alleged victims to file civil lawsuits against their accused attackers within a specific window, even if the state’s statute of limitations had run out on their claims.

Now, Kevin Parker, a Democrat state senator representing Brooklyn, is calling the Adult Survivors Act unconstitutional, and yet he voted for it.
Olga Jean-Baptiste alleges that when she was working with Parker on relief efforts for Haiti in 2004, he grabbed her by the wrists and forcibly raped her at her home.

NY Dem Who Voted For Law Meant to Ensnare President Trump Now Says Law is Unconstitutional After Rape Suit Against Him | The Gateway Pundit | by Margaret Flavin

When Democrat politicians in New York passed the Adult Survivors Act to punish Donald Trump and provide the ability for E.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[tirwin1]

Our elected class is nothing if not the biggest hypocrites on the planet.

 

[IrishMick]

What kind of law is so important to be passed that it expires 18 months later? Bullshit law target political opponents. Can't leave it around too long or it could be turned against them. Who at this point can't see the political lawfare being waged?

 

[dwa12479]

Knock knock : "Who is it?"

"ITS KARMA BITCH!"

 

[Bigfoot]

 

[FP1201]

Our elected class is nothing if not the biggest RACIEST hypocrites on the planet.

FIFY

 

[Bigfoot]

Wait, what?

 

[Bigfoot]

 

[Bigfoot]

-


Trump 2024 MAGA



-

 

[spat]

Knock knock : "Who is it?"

"ITS KARMA BITCH!"

View attachment 234508

 

[Bigfoot]

 

[Bigfoot]

 

[Bigfoot]

It just moved lol, something down there just got bigger.

Something about the word bayonet probably did it.

 

[Bigfoot]

Our elected class is nothing if not the biggest hypocrites on the planet.

 

[Zerex]

The law is an ex post facto law..............and is likely quite unconstitutional................

Only Murder, seemingly has no statute of limitations.....................so the Clintons are still vulnerable.

 

[dwa12479]

The law is an ex post facto law..............and is likely quite unconstitutional................

Only Murder, seemingly has no statute of limitations.....................so the Clintons are still vulnerable.

No. Ex post facto is prosecuting someone for doing something which was legal at the time, but has since been made illegal. It has no relevance to this case. This law was just a dirty trick by Ds to damage a political opponent they're terrified of.

 

[Zerex]

THAT'S WHAT AN EX POST FACTO LAW IS.

In this case he did not do the crime and the time frame made it beyond the statute of limitations, but this law made it legal to go after him for a crime he did not committ., by changing the statute of Lims for him specifically...but it is still in conflict because of that attempt.

Judge refutes claims that 80% of Trump civil fraud case was dismissed | Fact check

The judge presiding over the trial said all claims are allowable under the statute of limitations. No part of the case has been dropped.

www.usatoday.com

 

[dwa12479]

THAT'S WHAT AN EX POST FACTO LAW IS.

In this case he did not do the crime and the time frame made it beyond the statute of limitations, but this law made it legal to go after him for a crime he did not committ., by changing the statute of Lims for him specifically...but it is still in conflict because of that attempt.

Judge refutes claims that 80% of Trump civil fraud case was dismissed | Fact check

The judge presiding over the trial said all claims are allowable under the statute of limitations. No part of the case has been dropped.

www.usatoday.com

Civil. Law.

Not criminal. Very different. Stop.

 

[Deplorable Me]

 

[JRtraderny]

No. Ex post facto is prosecuting someone for doing something which was legal at the time, but has since been made illegal. It has no relevance to this case. This law was just a dirty trick by Ds to damage a political opponent they're terrified of.

Oh you mean like the SAFE Act and CCIA Act , Roger that .

 

[Beerman]

THAT'S WHAT AN EX POST FACTO LAW IS.

In this case he did not do the crime and the time frame made it beyond the statute of limitations, but this law made it legal to go after him for a crime he did not committ., by changing the statute of Lims for him specifically...but it is still in conflict because of that attempt.

Judge refutes claims that 80% of Trump civil fraud case was dismissed | Fact check

The judge presiding over the trial said all claims are allowable under the statute of limitations. No part of the case has been dropped.

www.usatoday.com

Yeah, except for all the no. You’re so very incorrect.

 

[Zerex]

They would not prosecute him criminally in the E jean Blower case, but did so civilly, as the new statute allowed it. EX POST FACTO

In the current CRIMINAL TRIAL, the statue iof lims has also passed ,but the animal cannibal presiding over the prosecution ,and the judge are just ignoring the law and making it up daily.