NY Senate Looking to Redefine “firearm” - potential ban of “other”

[Jem45472]

I read the same thing. "Weapon" is still a part of that sentence you quoted. It doesn't say 'weapon or...'

I maintain that a receiver isn't a weapon until you add a barrel/chamber at the absolute minimum.

Probably wouldn't fly in a NY court but not much logic does anymore.

Let's not just accept what they say in press conferences. At the very minimum, we should refuse to concede to their lunatic policies when they can't even articulate them accurately in statute.

I agree with you there. At that point it's still a brick, but as you know, we're not dealing with rational people.

 

[Acer-m14]

"shall also include any other weapon that is not otherwise defined"

so what is the weapon ??

 

[Grimscale]

"We are changing the name of an item so we can ban it."

I'd like to try "things a pre-schooler would say" for $400, Alex.


Change names all you want. It only shows how stupid you are to the rest of the world.

 

[Bananabandit]

Bunch of booger eating, butt itching window lickers. All Im sayin is good luck.