So, the state says they can't issue licenses, and SCOTUS says they must allow anyone who isn't explicitly prohibited to carry.
Why would they care ?This is all unconstitutional.
Is it that they want to get sued further? I don't get it.......
I really wish they could be held personally liable. It should be that way if you are a public servant.Why would they care ?
It's not like they worry about efficiently spending tax dollars.
They can't be held personally liable
I just hope some judge has the balls to issue an injunction that says:I really wish they could be held personally liable. It should be that way if you are a public servant.
You still wouldn't be able to buy a gun though. And no one will send 80%s to NY. Hell after this week they won't be sent anywhere.I just hope some judge has the balls to issue an injunction that says:
"since you aren't issuing licenses according to the SCOTUS ruling you can't require people to have them. NY is enjoined from enforcing the relevant parts of PL265 until a compliant licensing scheme is in place".
Bam, if your don't want to issue licenses, then you're constitutional carry until you do.
Depends in how the injunction was worded.You still wouldn't be able to buy a gun though. And no one will send 80%s to NY. Hell after this week they won't be sent anywhere.
Thanks. I sent a message.feel free to send us a message using the form at 2Ahotline.com: FPC Legal Action Hotline - Submit a Report or call our toll-free Legal Action Hotline at (855) 252-4510. The primary objective of the Hotline and our legal action programs is to find legally-significant issues and bring cases that defend and advance fundamental rights and individual liberty
Kathy will not like it. I’ll bet they give us more than she ever planned for if they push it.I would like to hear what Justice Thomas has to say about this.
I'm worried about what will happen to law-abiding people when those who feel they've been pushed too far decide to start holding these out-of-control politicians personally liable.I really wish they could be held personally liable. It should be that way if you are a public servant.