camper4lyfe
.308 Win
Arent you
Lol
Nope
Arent you
Lol
The federal court did rule on the constitutionality of the SAFE act.this is confusing
United States courts of appeals—Decisions of the U.S. courts of appeals are mandatory on district courts and other lower courts within the circuit. ... Statesupreme court decisions will also be binding on federal courts that are interpreting the state's law under diversity jurisdiction.
Federal courts of appeals decisions are not binding on state courts. ... Statesupreme court decisions will also be binding on federal courts that are interpreting the state's law under diversity jurisdiction.
Federal courts may overrule a state court only when there is a federal question, which is to say, a specific issue (such as consistency with the Federal Constitution) that gives rise to federal jurisdiction
so what I take of this is that if it is a constitual law they are binding
The federal court did rule on the constitutionality of the SAFE act.
It’s not a suggestion as the DA thought.
Joshua Gregory
Do you seriously think you’re ever going to be in a situation that a law enforcement officer is?
I certainly don’t want anyone to lose their firearms unlawfully, but this thought pattern is borderline unhinged.