kev74
20×102mm Vulcan

PA Democrat Lawmaker Who Proposed Mandatory Vasectomies for Men Backtracks and Now Claims It was Just "Parody Legislation" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Pennsylvania Democrat Christopher M.

For those that don't get it : WHAT TEXAS DOES IS NO CONCERN TO A STATE REPRESENTATIVE FROM PENNSYLVANIA.For those that don't get it... it's an absurd bill to point out the ridiculousness of the recent Texas abortion legislation. He's not actually serious about passing it. Carry on though, I wouldn't want to observe an obvious joke go to waste.
For those that don't get it : WHAT TEXAS DOES IS NO CONCERN TO A STATE REPRESENTATIVE FROM PENNSYLVANIA.
You're welcome.
Well, there is a difference between discussing it, and introducing legislation about it.If you follow that line of logic then by extension it's no concern to anyone from NY then either. Good, lets never make a post about anything from Texas on here again.
Oh yeah, wait....
What about the other 43 sexes?You know I can get on board with this. If a guy has more than one child he is not paying child support for, chop the balls off. If a girl has kids from two or more fathers (who are not paying child support) and is she is getting public assistance rip out her uterus.
Well, there is a difference between discussing it, and introducing legislation about it.
But I don't agree that what happens in one state is no concern to others.
*I* think Texas should be taking notice of the things going on in NY TBH. I think they should use the NY pistol permit scheme as a model for their abortion regulation. "Well, if NY can regulate one right this way without it getting thrown out by the courts, we should be able regulate another 'right' that way too".
4 references, and you need to prove that you *need* the abortion, more than the general public needs one. You need to get it approved by a judge who can deny it if he doesn't think your "need" is sufficient.
I think it is the two with sperm and eggs that are the problem.What about the other 43 sexes?