red flag laws, SC rules in a 9-0 decision

[Jmac00]

are unconstitutional. Period. So why are the deamonRats even trying to pass RFL's

Supreme Court Ruling Delegitimizes Red Flag Laws - Libertas Institute

The ruling is a validation of both 2nd and 4th Amendment rights, reaffirming the importance of due process, property rights, and the presumption of innocence.

libertas.org

For the first time in 13 years, the Court upheld both privacy and gun rights, this time unanimously. Caniglia v. Strom’s 9-0 decision has the potential to create lasting effects and set precedent as powerful as was DC v. Heller in 2008.

 

[Defilade]

are unconstitutional. Period. So why are the deamonRats even trying to pass RFL's

Why are the Cops in his home? Do they not know that it is unconstitutional?? Maybe they need to go back to school. Or once again maybe they are cowards for not standing up against it. They know it is wrong.

 

[Bigfoot]

That's where I was born and raised. I Shouldn't have left SC.

Then ending up in NY of all places...
To be fair NY wasn't as bad in 1990 when I moved here.
NY was no SC but it was still acceptable to me.
Of course, that has all changed.

I can't wait for my time to get out of this shithole in two more years.

 

[Edwardteach72]

are unconstitutional. Period. So why are the deamonRats even trying to pass RFL's

This is a year old

 

[Jmac00]

This is a year old

EXACTLY, SCOTUS ruled over a year ago, RFL were unconstitutional, period,

Yet we have state after state passing RFL despite it being unconstitutional, just how stupid are law makers? don't answer that, it was rhetorical

 

[FP1201]

are unconstitutional. Period. So why are the deamonRats even trying to pass RFL's

so, will we have to file a lawsuit in NY to have their newly minted Red Flag Laws overturned?

 

[byron]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-157_8mjp.pdf

 

[tirwin1]

Laws? The dems don't need no stinkin' laws......

 

[SomeSoldier]

Treason, hang them.

 

[spat]

EXACTLY, SCOTUS ruled over a year ago, RFL were unconstitutional, period,

Yet we have state after state passing RFL despite it being unconstitutional, just how stupid are law makers? don't answer that, it was rhetorical

Don't mistake malevolence for stupidity.

They know it's unconstitutional.

They don't care.

There is no punishment for them for knowingly violating the constitution. None.

So, they'll keep passing this crap, and the cops will keep enforcing it, and people will keep suffering.

 

[Jem45472]

That's where I was born and raised. I Shouldn't have left SC.

Then ending up in NY of all places...
To be fair NY wasn't as bad in 1990 when I moved here.
NY was no SC but it was still acceptable to me.
Of course, that has all changed.

I can't wait for my time to get out of this shithole in two more years.

NY is completely different now compared to the 80's, and not for the better.

 

[Truebeliever]

Why are the Cops in his home? Do they not know that it is unconstitutional?? Maybe they need to go back to school. Or once again maybe they are cowards for not standing up against it. They know it is wrong.

The wife let them in and showed them where his two pistols were.

 

[prambo]

Don't mistake malevolence for stupidity.

They know it's unconstitutional.

They don't care.

There is no punishment for them for knowingly violating the constitution. None.

So, they'll keep passing this crap, and the cops will keep enforcing it, and people will keep suffering.

Basically, "the rule of law", posited to be a bedrock American principal, with SCROTUM as its ultimate arbiter, is now dead.

The fUSA now operates under mob rule, usually conducted on Twatter or Farcebook.

 

[spat]

The wife let them in and showed them where his two pistols were.

Did she ask them to take them ?

Were they on her pistol permit ? If not, then they weren't hers to give, and they just straight up stole them.

 

[Truebeliever]

Did she ask them to take them ?

Were they on her pistol permit ? If not, then they weren't hers to give, and they just straight up stole them.

No, she claims that she thought her husband wanted to turn them over.
And it’s not theft despite what you think. It’s legal to voucher them for safekeeping at a minimum. The question is can they keep them.

 

[Truebeliever]

Thank you for the excuse to do the research.
This case DOES NOT apply to red flag laws. In the concurring opinion justice Alito writes:
“ They typi- cally specify the standard that must be met and the proce- dures that must be followed before firearms may be seized. Provisions of red flag laws may be challenged under the Fourth Amendment, and those cases may come before us. Our decision today does not address those issues”

 

[spat]

No, she claims that she thought her husband wanted to turn them over.
And it’s not theft despite what you think. It’s legal to voucher them for safekeeping at a minimum. The question is can they keep them.

The law might not call it theft, but it is.

"Safe keeping" is utterly ridiculous in this context. They were safer where they were.

Anyone who believed "her husband wanted to turn them over" is either acting in bad faith, or they are a complete moron.

 

[Defilade]

Yes it is theft! It's personal property. State doesn't own it.

 

[4WHLDRFTN]

Red Flag Law Turns Deadly: Police Kill Senior Citizen Who Refused To Give Up His Gun

Police officers were attempting to implement Maryland's new red flag law and, during the process of trying to confiscate a citizen's weapon, shot and killed

genzconservative.com