Relentless Trump: Names Judge To Replace Barrett’s Vacant Seat On Seventh Circuit

[livingston]

Relentless Trump: Names Judge To Replace Barrett’s Vacant Seat On Seventh Circuit

President Trump, determined to use his power while in office to strengthen the conservative tenor in the judiciary around the nation, is wasting no time finding a replacement for the seat likely to be vacated by the ascension of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.

Trump has nominated a replacement for the soon-to-be empty seat on the Seventh Circuit Court Appeals: Thomas Kirsch, 46, presently the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Indiana.
“This time around, he will face fierce opposition from Democrats. However, Republicans have the votes to confirm Kirsch and enough time (approximately two months) in which to get it done.”

The Chicago Tribune reported that Kirsch has “built a reputation for aggressively pursuing public corruption and gang crimes

Relentless Trump: Names Judge To Replace Barrett’s Vacant Seat On Seventh Circuit

President Trump, determined to use his power while in office to strengthen the conservative tenor in the judiciary around the nation, is wasting no time finding a replacement for the seat likely to be vacated by the ascension of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. Trump has nominated a...

www.dailywire.com

 

[kev74]

Correction - he'll have 4 years and 2 months to get it done.

 

[Dr. Evil]

Murkowski to Vote to Confirm Judge Barrett to the Supreme Court

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[Jsmegs77]

I think two justices plus the numerous lower court appointments will be his most important contribution of his term. I did think that the booming economy was, but the scamdemic actors seem to have trashed that well and truly.

 

[Dr. Evil]

I think two justices plus the numerous lower court appointments will be his most important contribution of his term. I did think that the booming economy was, but the scamdemic actors seem to have trashed that well and truly.

I've always felt the court appointments, especially the supreme court ones, were the most important reasons for him to win in 2016.

 

[spat]

I've always felt the court appointments, especially the supreme court ones, were the most important reasons for him to win in 2016.

In 2016 I wasn't sure what he would be like on policy. I just knew it was unlikely to be worse than Hillary. I mostly voted for him for the judiciary.

Boy was I surprised when he turned out to be the best thing for conservatives since Reagan.