Yeah let’s not get excited. This was a routine extension of time to file, not a decision to hear the case. There is nothing to be learned from this.
Since large faction of pro- gun side came out against bump-stocks, including the NRA, it will be easy for SCOTUS to rule against them. This is why they took this case. This is no good, bad precedent will be established.
They don't even want to uphold normal capacity magazines, no way they will uphold bump stocks.
the box van truck lets say aka GMC didn't have to crush all there Trucks or company's that owned them because some nut drove thru a crowed and killed a bunch and injured a bunch more ..
Yeah let's grant cert to bumpstock garbage..yet Safe Act?
Yeah I mean when you think about a Justice, they are highly educated, often from decent and rural upbringings, reside around DC. In general not the kind of people you’d come to associate with defending gun rights.Another example of the so-called "Conservative" Supreme Court totally avoiding meaningful gun cases, is it not time for Roberts to just stop living in denial and admit he is a gun-hating liberal.