Secret Service releases threat assessment on mass shootings

[Saltwater60]

The sun up is mental health issues lead to public mass shootings and 96% are done in gun free zones. Wow.

Secret Service Releases Study on Mass Shootings, Mainstream Media Ignores a Huge Commonality

The term “mental health” is used 57 times in the 60-page report, yet the reports being generated by the media don’t mention that.

www.gunsamerica.com

 

[Acer-m14]

"The term “mental health” is used 57 times in the 60-page report, yet the reports being generated by the mainstream media won’t mention that aspect at all.

SEE ALSO: Alec Baldwin Skipped Firearms Training On ‘Rust’ Set

This poses some serious concerns when you consider what the media’s role is in shaping the general public’s perception about the topic. "

 

[Mr. terzmo]

The issue is "mental health" Something has got to be askew in one's head to go out and start shooting people just because something in that person's head has come to the conclusion that it's the way to go. Also add suicide for a person with a perfectly "healthy" body except for the brainpan.
AND...the answer is to make more gun laws that only affect law abiding citizens. Mental people and the bad guys will always have/get a firearm no matter what laws are enacted. Prohibition didn't work well. The gun grabbers have millions believing their propaganda BS. They have millions believing all semi automatic guns are "assault" weapons. They have millions believing the 2nd amendment doesn't apply to private citizens. AND those millions are electing like kind politicians. That's the "problem"

 

[Saltwater60]

The issue is "mental health" Something has got to be askew in one's head to go out and start shooting people just because something in that person's head has come to the conclusion that it's the way to go. Also add suicide for a person with a perfectly "healthy" body except for the brainpan.
AND...the answer is to make more gun laws that only affect law abiding citizens. Mental people and the bad guys will always have/get a firearm no matter what laws are enacted. Prohibition didn't work well. The gun grabbers have millions believing their propaganda BS. They have millions believing all semi automatic guns are "assault" weapons. They have millions believing the 2nd amendment doesn't apply to private citizens. AND those millions are electing like kind politicians. That's the "problem"

While I agree with you but how mentally unfit are they if they can plan all of that and chose a gun free zone. Being mentally unfit means you don’t know the difference between right and wrong legally speaking for trial but these people made a lot of decisions.
Here is the definition of mentally unfit and I would say none of these people are that for the most part.
an absence of mental capacity. 2. : an inability through mental illness or significant cognitive impairment to carry on the everyday affairs of life or to care for one's person or property with reasonable discretion.
I would say most do these acts because of past wrongs to them or gang related killings. These studies seem to be public mass shootings so more likely they have been wronged by this crowd in the past. The sad thing is most of these could have been prevented if a family member spoke up, a school official spoke up, the cops and DA’s did their jobs, or a straw purchase didn’t happen.
I personally don’t think it’s all mental health related and there’s a healthy dose of revenge or embarrassment tossed into the equation. I agree to shoot up a place you have to be mentally unwell.

 

[Mr. terzmo]

While I agree with you but how mentally unfit are they if they can plan all of that and chose a gun free zone. Being mentally unfit means you don’t know the difference between right and wrong legally speaking for trial but these people made a lot of decisions.
Here is the definition of mentally unfit and I would say none of these people are that for the most part.
an absence of mental capacity. 2. : an inability through mental illness or significant cognitive impairment to carry on the everyday affairs of life or to care for one's person or property with reasonable discretion.
I would say most do these acts because of past wrongs to them or gang related killings. These studies seem to be public mass shootings so more likely they have been wronged by this crowd in the past. The sad thing is most of these could have been prevented if a family member spoke up, a school official spoke up, the cops and DA’s did their jobs, or a straw purchase didn’t happen.
I personally don’t think it’s all mental health related and there’s a healthy dose of revenge or embarrassment tossed into the equation. I agree to shoot up a place you have to be mentally unwell.

I can't judge/ agree or disagree the definition on how it would apply as My only information is from media sources.

 

[Acer-m14]

no morals , no remorse , no compassion ..

 

[Grimscale]

no morals , no remorse , no compassion ..

Careful......the left would say the same about anyone willing to use a gun to defend themselves.

the answer is to make more gun laws that only affect law abiding citizens.

If you were to give the democrats the benefit of the doubt about their intentions, they are attempting to PREVENT future crimes. Something we already know is near to impossible.
this makes the left target the "law abiding" in the hopes that they can catch a "mass shooter" before that person commits the crime.

if you were to realize the reality of what the democrats intend, that they want total global subjugation which can only be achieved by not having anyone left who can oppose them and their minions, targeting the "law abiding" is deliberate, and these criminals are given a pat on the back and an "adios" to go out and commit more crime.

The "progressive prosecutor" and judge who allowed the most recent "mass shooter" to walk out of court are responsible for any crime he then commits within the time period he would have otherwise been locked up. They, legitimately, could have prevented this and didn't. Without affecting any other "law abiding" citizen.

 

[Mr. terzmo]

Careful......the left would say the same about anyone willing to use a gun to defend themselves.



If you were to give the democrats the benefit of the doubt about their intentions, they are attempting to PREVENT future crimes. Something we already know is near to impossible.
this makes the left target the "law abiding" in the hopes that they can catch a "mass shooter" before that person commits the crime.

if you were to realize the reality of what the democrats intend, that they want total global subjugation which can only be achieved by not having anyone left who can oppose them and their minions, targeting the "law abiding" is deliberate, and these criminals are given a pat on the back and an "adios" to go out and commit more crime.

The "progressive prosecutor" and judge who allowed the most recent "mass shooter" to walk out of court are responsible for any crime he then commits within the time period he would have otherwise been locked up. They, legitimately, could have prevented this and didn't. Without affecting any other "law abiding" citizen.

My quote...read the entire paragraph. This is typical of media distorting what one says or writes

 

[Acer-m14]

Careful......the left would say the same about anyone willing to use a gun to defend themselves.



If you were to give the democrats the benefit of the doubt about their intentions, they are attempting to PREVENT future crimes. Something we already know is near to impossible.
this makes the left target the "law abiding" in the hopes that they can catch a "mass shooter" before that person commits the crime.

if you were to realize the reality of what the democrats intend, that they want total global subjugation which can only be achieved by not having anyone left who can oppose them and their minions, targeting the "law abiding" is deliberate, and these criminals are given a pat on the back and an "adios" to go out and commit more crime.

The "progressive prosecutor" and judge who allowed the most recent "mass shooter" to walk out of court are responsible for any crime he then commits within the time period he would have otherwise been locked up. They, legitimately, could have prevented this and didn't. Without affecting any other "law abiding" citizen.

just watch it ..