Senate agrees to Bipartisan broad outline of new gun laws (Merged threads)

Jmac00

Jmac00

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
18,845
Reaction score
51,639
Location
somewhere in America
gun violence is at a 30 years high. well why is that?

crime prosecution is at a 40 year low, its so bad, San Francisco just recalled there DA = Dumb-ass or District Attorney

So the dumbass people of America want gun control, ‘eh.

When a drunk driver kills a family, America blames the drunk, not the car manufacturer or the alcohol, we blame the drunk, period.

When a bomber blows up a building and kills a bunch of people, we blame the bomber. No one sued the company that made the pressure cooker, or the fertilizer, or the fuel

When Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK, no one blamed the gun. They blamed Oswald

When James Hodgkinson walked on to a baseball field and shot 5 people, including a sitting congressman, no one called for “gun control”. Apparently its ok to shoot and kill politicians, THAT would not be the guns fault.

When Muslims hijack a plane and crash it into a couple buildings, we are asked to not blame ALL Muslims. But when one mentally unstable shit head shoots 20 people, ALL GUN OWNERS and the GUN are to blame. Why is that? How is it the fault of law abiding gun owners?

And many of the last mass shooters were known to law enforcement. The Parkland shooter had multiple encounters with Law enforcement. Even with the FBI, they DID NOTHING. until AFTER something bad happened. How is that the fault of law abiding gun owners

The Buffalo shooter was known to Law enforcement. ALMOST all his friends knew he was a whack job, but they said nothing and did nothing. How is that the faut of Law-abiding gun owners?

Now everyone is calling for background checks. We already have background checks. The problem is, like the Robb Elementary shooter, he was never reported to the BGC system. He tried to buy a gun when he was 17, the law worked, he was denied. When he turned 18, he was allowed, By LAW, to purchase his firearms. He was never reported to the system. The system only works if the proper authorities have the necessary information.

In conclusion, you can pass all the gun laws you want, between Federal laws and state laws, there are about 27,000 laws on the books, how is a few more going to help? but what are you going to do when this happens again? You want MORE gun control. You’re delusional if you think taking guns from law abiding people will reduce violence. And lets make no mistake here, its NOT gun violence, it is simply violence.
St louis and Chicago have the strictest gun laws in the country, they are two of the most violent in the nation. New Yorkistan has the “Safe Act”, that was supposed to stop people like the Buffalo shooter ( will never publish his name or the Robb Elementary school shooter’s name) The safe act was designed, and passed into law, exactly for this reason. It is a miserable failure, by every measure.
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
48,762
Reaction score
134,236
Location
livingston county
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Senators Reach Agreement on Gun Control, Including Red Flag Laws to Take Guns from Law-Abiding Americans - Here Are the 10 Republicans Who Joined the Dems | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

A group of bipartisan senators on Sunday reached an agreement on principle for gun legislation which includes ‘red flag’ laws.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee rejected an amendment that would have red-flagged anyone who law enforcement lists as a gang member. According to JPFo_Org 80% of gun homicides are committed by gang members.

Democrats frown on targeting gang databases with 'red flag' laws​

September 14, 2019
House Democrats this week advanced a new measure to encourage states to pass “red flag” laws, known as extreme risk protection orders, that authorize removing guns and ammunition from dangerous individuals.

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee amended the measure during a Wednesday mark-up to authorize the federal government to issue extreme risk protection orders in some instances, but they rejected an amendment that would have red-flagged anyone who law enforcement lists as a gang member.
“The majority of violent crime, including gun violence, in the United States is linked to gangs,” Rep. Ken Buck, a Colorado Republican who sponsored the amendment, said Wednesday. “My amendment is quite simple. It would allow the issuance of a red flag order against anyone whose name appears in a gang database if there was probable cause to include that individual in the database.”

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Democrats frown on targeting gang databases with ‘red flag’ laws - Washington Examiner

House Democrats this week advanced a new measure to encourage states to pass “red flag” laws, known as extreme risk protection orders, that authorize removing guns and ammunition from dangerous individuals.Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee amended the measure during a Wednesday mark-up...
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com

I understand this is from a while ago ... 3-4 years... But Democrats seem to want to protect their base
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
48,762
Reaction score
134,236
Location
livingston county
Jmac00 said:
gun violence is at a 30 years high. well why is that?

crime prosecution is at a 40 year low, its so bad, San Francisco just recalled there DA = Dumb-ass or District Attorney

So the dumbass people of America want gun control, ‘eh.

When a drunk driver kills a family, America blames the drunk, not the car manufacturer or the alcohol, we blame the drunk, period.

When a bomber blows up a building and kills a bunch of people, we blame the bomber. No one sued the company that made the pressure cooker, or the fertilizer, or the fuel

When Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK, no one blamed the gun. They blamed Oswald

When James Hodgkinson walked on to a baseball field and shot 5 people, including a sitting congressman, no one called for “gun control”. Apparently its ok to shoot and kill politicians, THAT would not be the guns fault.

When Muslims hijack a plane and crash it into a couple buildings, we are asked to not blame ALL Muslims. But when one mentally unstable shit head shoots 20 people, ALL GUN OWNERS and the GUN are to blame. Why is that? How is it the fault of law abiding gun owners?

And many of the last mass shooters were known to law enforcement. The Parkland shooter had multiple encounters with Law enforcement. Even with the FBI, they DID NOTHING. until AFTER something bad happened. How is that the fault of law abiding gun owners

The Buffalo shooter was known to Law enforcement. ALMOST all his friends knew he was a whack job, but they said nothing and did nothing. How is that the faut of Law-abiding gun owners?

Now everyone is calling for background checks. We already have background checks. The problem is, like the Robb Elementary shooter, he was never reported to the BGC system. He tried to buy a gun when he was 17, the law worked, he was denied. When he turned 18, he was allowed, By LAW, to purchase his firearms. He was never reported to the system. The system only works if the proper authorities have the necessary information.

In conclusion, you can pass all the gun laws you want, between Federal laws and state laws, there are about 27,000 laws on the books, how is a few more going to help? but what are you going to do when this happens again? You want MORE gun control. You’re delusional if you think taking guns from law abiding people will reduce violence. And lets make no mistake here, its NOT gun violence, it is simply violence.
St louis and Chicago have the strictest gun laws in the country, they are two of the most violent in the nation. New Yorkistan has the “Safe Act”, that was supposed to stop people like the Buffalo shooter ( will never publish his name or the Robb Elementary school shooter’s name) The safe act was designed, and passed into law, exactly for this reason. It is a miserable failure, by every measure.
Click to expand...
there are about 27,000 laws on the books, how is a few more going to help?
They want to disarm gun owners by a thousand cuts ...
 
L

livingston

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
48,762
Reaction score
134,236
Location
livingston county

Senate Comes to Agreement on New Gun Restrictions, UniParty Republicans Support New Measures​

If approved, the structure looks somewhat similar to current discussion. Continued or new firearm ownership will be permitted if the cross functional DHS/FBI social media and cognitive stability panel (the moderators inside Govt, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Google, Microsoft) approve the mental outlook of the firearm applicant.

The NSA database containing all privacy information on individuals will likely be accessed by a much larger audience of stakeholders (teachers, employers, social workers, bureaucrats) who will conduct ongoing stability reviews for firearm owners and flag any concerning content.
theconservativetreehouse.com

Senate Comes to Agreement on New Gun Restrictions, UniParty Republicans Support New Measures - The Last Refuge

Democrats and Republicans in the Senate have announced their agreement for new laws which will restrict gun ownership. The measures include a new federal firearm registry (known colloquially as “enhanced background checks”), and new laws for the federal government to define the standard of...
theconservativetreehouse.com theconservativetreehouse.com

1655085171092.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top